2020
DOI: 10.1175/waf-d-19-0253.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Error Distributions of Hurricane Intensity Forecasts during Rapid Intensity Changes

Abstract: The characteristics of official National Hurricane Center (NHC) intensity forecast errors are examined for the North Atlantic and East Pacific basins from 1989-2018. It is shown how rapid intensification (RI) and rapid weakening (RW) influence yearly NHC forecast errors for forecasts between 12 to 48 hours in length. In addition to being the tail of the intensity change distribution, RI and RW are at the tails of the forecast error distribution. Yearly mean absolute forecast errors are positively correlated wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The documented relationship between TC intensification and the storm environment is supported by theory and numerous modeling experiments 39 43 . Although internal dynamical processes of TCs are also important for RI 44 , they are challenging to quantify and predict even with high-resolution numerical weather prediction models 3 . Additionally, it is not currently possible to assess how the internal dynamical processes will change with global warming using global climate models while large-scale environmental conditions are well-observed and captured by global climate models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The documented relationship between TC intensification and the storm environment is supported by theory and numerous modeling experiments 39 43 . Although internal dynamical processes of TCs are also important for RI 44 , they are challenging to quantify and predict even with high-resolution numerical weather prediction models 3 . Additionally, it is not currently possible to assess how the internal dynamical processes will change with global warming using global climate models while large-scale environmental conditions are well-observed and captured by global climate models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last five years, guidance models and National Hurricane Center (NHC) forecasts have exhibited more skill in forecasting RI in the east Pacific and North Atlantic (hereafter, Atlantic refers to the North Atlantic) basins 2 . However, the intensity forecast errors for RI events are still approximately 2–3 times larger than non-RI events, depending on forecast lead time 3 . The forecasting challenges associated with these RI events were likely exacerbated by the recent upward trend in the proportion of storms that achieved RI 4 – 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…
After lagging improvements in track forecasts over the last few decades, tropical cyclone (TC) intensity change prediction has recently improved (Cangialosi et al, 2020) led by progress in numerical weather prediction and our fundamental understanding of TC processes. Rapid intensification (RI, defined by an increase in maximum-sustained wind ≥30 kt in 24 hr; Kaplan & DeMaria, 2003), however, still has comparatively poor forecasts (Cangialosi et al, 2020;Fischer et al, 2019;Trabing & Bell, 2020). More than 75% of all RI events initially have intensities of 55 kt or less (Wang & Jiang, 2021; cf., Figure 6).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the forecasting toward hurricane track and intensity improves greatly in previous years, evidences still show comparability large yearly mean absolute errors due to the complexity of air-sea interactions and thermodynamic process [27], especially the long-term forecasting of hurricane intensity [28]. Therefore, this DIU should be incorporated to maintain the robustness of the SWDD-ASs.…”
Section: Decision-dependent Intensity-related Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%