2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Emotion Inflexibility in Risk for Affective Disease: Integrating Current Research and Finding a Path Forward

Abstract: Emotion-related disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety, stress, eating, substance and some personality disorders) include some of the most common, burdensome, and costly diseases worldwide. Central to many, if not all of these disorders, may be patterns of rigid or inflexible emotion responses. Indeed, theorists point to emotion in-flexibility as a potential cause or maintaining factor in emotion-related diseases. Despite the increasing prominence of emotion inflexibility in theories of affective disease, a comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When faced with challenging events, these individuals tend to display stronger state orientation -a regulatory mode characterized by indecision and hesitation that prevents change to mental and behavioral states (Kuhl, 2000). Dispositions toward state orientation in these clinical populations is unsurprising given the difficulties they exhibit in down-regulating negative and up-regulating positive emotions; poor regulatory control over one's emotional reactions has long been recognized as a reliable predictor of many psychiatric (affective) illnesses, and emotional inflexibility predicts pathology following stressful events (Coifman and Summers, 2019). Moreover, the results of the present study align closely with those of our previous investigation with an independent large-scale sample, which revealed an inflexible personality profile characterized by a strong tendency toward avoidant, borderline and depressive personality styles, and state-oriented regulation (Shaw et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When faced with challenging events, these individuals tend to display stronger state orientation -a regulatory mode characterized by indecision and hesitation that prevents change to mental and behavioral states (Kuhl, 2000). Dispositions toward state orientation in these clinical populations is unsurprising given the difficulties they exhibit in down-regulating negative and up-regulating positive emotions; poor regulatory control over one's emotional reactions has long been recognized as a reliable predictor of many psychiatric (affective) illnesses, and emotional inflexibility predicts pathology following stressful events (Coifman and Summers, 2019). Moreover, the results of the present study align closely with those of our previous investigation with an independent large-scale sample, which revealed an inflexible personality profile characterized by a strong tendency toward avoidant, borderline and depressive personality styles, and state-oriented regulation (Shaw et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that their brain will display lower neural state dynamics over time which may in turn lead to less flexibility in mental processing. Notably, inflexibility across a number of psychological domains is a common feature in those with depression and has been identified as a risk factor for developing such a condition (Coifman & Summers, 2019; Miranda et al., 2012; Stange et al., 2017). This highlights the relevance of investigating such functions and related brain features across a full range of depressive symptom levels in both patients and sub‐clinical individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may reflect an ability to move easily from a critical state, where there is the maximum potential to respond flexibly to changing demands, to a sub‐critical one where processing can be focussed on a single task (Beggs & Plenz, 2003; Irrmischer, Poil, et al, 2018). A reduction in such psychological flexibility is a commonly reported depressive symptom and is a risk factor for serious depressive episodes (Coifman & Summers, 2019; Miranda, Gallagher, Bauchner, Vaysman, & Marroquín, 2012; Stange, Alloy, & Fresco, 2017). It is not clear, however, if these psychological symptoms can be mapped to underlying dynamic states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in depression, one might expect negative events to be very likely to occur and positive events likely to be absent. When these expectations are overly precise, this could lead to a phenomenon of cognitive inflexibility, which is known to contribute to depression ( Coifman and Summers, 2019 ; Leahy et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: A Theoretical Framework To Understand the Link Between Psychosis And Rapid Antidepressantsmentioning
confidence: 99%