Understanding effects of armed conflict on health outcomes: the case of Nepal

Abstract

ObjectiveThere is abundance of literature on adverse effects of conflict on the health of the population. In contrast to this, sporadic data in Nepal claim improvements in most of the health indicators during the decade-long armed conflict (1996-2006). However, systematic information to support or reject this claim is scant. This study reviews Nepal's key health indicators before and after the violent conflict and explores the possible factors facilitating the progress.MethodsA secondary analysis has been conducted of two demographic health surveys-Nepal Family Health Survey (NFHS) 1996 and Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2006; the latter was supplemented by a study carried out by the Nepal Health Research Council in 2006.ResultsThe data show Nepal has made progress in 16 out of 19 health indicators which are part of the Millennium Development Goals whilst three indicators have remained static. Our analysis suggests a number of conflict and non-conflict factors which may have led to this success.ConclusionThe lessons learnt from Nepal could be replicable elsewhere in conflict and post-conflict environments. A nationwide large-scale empirical study is needed to further assess the determinants of Nepal's success in the health sector at a time the country experienced a decade of armed conflict.

Study on Nutritional Problems in Preschool Aged Children of Kaski District of Nepal

“…poverty, caste, gender and social inequalities and conflict are regarded as secondary barriers for the nutritional problems in Nepal [21], [10], [11], [3]. The ten-year long conflict in Nepal has increasingly centralised systems, disrupt the development of rural areas and badly affected health services [22] and ultimate aims to migrate to secure place. Although the risks involved in lack of transport, high service cost, long distances, full trust on spiritual and traditional healers because they are easily available and affordable for poor people, insufficient health resources, and lack of capacity to treat serious problems at the nearby primary health care service centres.…”

Conflict in South Asia and its impact on health

“…17 This conflict led to population displacements and destruction of healthcare facilities and affected the already weak health system. 18 Pakistan As a result of multiple large influxes since 1979, Pakistan has hosted a vast number of Afghan refugees, burdening the already resource constrained public health delivery systems. 19 20 Furthermore, in 2015, more than 1.1 million people became internally displaced because of repeated military operations and sectarian violence in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas.…”

Conflict and Disease: A Complex Relationship

“…Even in the absence of such barriers, fear for personal safety may result in a negative correlation between healthcare seeking and the amount of conflict-related violence (Price & Bohara, 2012). In extreme cases, violent unrest can result in destruction of health posts, as well as kidnapping and torture of healthcare providers (Devkota & Teijlingen, 2010;Collins, 2006). Consequently, safety considerations may deter health aid organizations from serving these volatile regions (CLAS Berkeley, 2015).…”