Abstract:Background
Eating in the Absence of Hunger (EAH), or consuming highly palatable foods when satiated, is one behavioral pathway that may lead to childhood obesity. EAH is an objective, laboratory-based measure. A more comprehensive understanding of potential determinants of EAH could inform childhood obesity programs outside of a laboratory setting.
Objective
Systematic review of EAH experiments to identify individual, familial, and societal-level correlates of EAH among children 12 years of age or younger.
… Show more
“…Therefore, mechanisms driving EAH require further study, especially given associations between EAH and excess weight status. (12) Indeed, time of day may be a more salient factor in the context of eating episodes than EAH in individuals with obesity, suggesting that weight control interventions may benefit from addressing time of day effects on eating behavior (e.g., encouraging mindful eating in the evening, when distractions may be more common).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Disinhibited eating, characterized by a lack of healthy restraint over eating including eating in the absence of hunger (EAH), (4) may promote excess energy intake, (5) unhealthy weight gain, (6–8) and obesity. (9–11) Contrary to pediatric samples, (12) EAH in adults is underexplored, (5, 13–17) particularly in the natural environment. (18) …”
Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) is under-explored in adults with obesity. In this study, 50 adults with obesity recorded eating episodes and theoretically-relevant environmental, perceptual, and emotional correlates in the natural environment for 2 weeks via ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Generalized linear models and mixed models were used to characterize correlates and consequences of EAH vs. non-EAH episodes/tendencies (within-subjects and between-subjects effects, respectively), time of day, and time of day × EAH interactions. Approximately 21% of EMA-recorded eating episodes involved EAH, and 70% of participants reported at least 1 EAH episode. At the within-person level, participants’ EAH episodes were associated with greater self-labeled overeating than their non-EAH episodes. At the between-person level, participants who tended to engage in more EAH reported less self-labeled overeating than those who engaged in less EAH. Across EAH and non-EAH episodes, eating in the evening was associated with overeating, expecting eating to be more rewarding, greater alcoholic beverage consumption, eating alone, eating because others are eating, and eating while watching television. Significant EAH × time of day interactions were also observed but the pattern of findings was not consistent. Findings suggest that EAH may be a relevant target for reducing food intake in individuals with obesity given its high prevalence and association with perceptions of overeating, although results should be extended using objective measures of food intake. Associations between evening eating episodes and perceptual and environmental factors should be further explored.
“…Therefore, mechanisms driving EAH require further study, especially given associations between EAH and excess weight status. (12) Indeed, time of day may be a more salient factor in the context of eating episodes than EAH in individuals with obesity, suggesting that weight control interventions may benefit from addressing time of day effects on eating behavior (e.g., encouraging mindful eating in the evening, when distractions may be more common).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Disinhibited eating, characterized by a lack of healthy restraint over eating including eating in the absence of hunger (EAH), (4) may promote excess energy intake, (5) unhealthy weight gain, (6–8) and obesity. (9–11) Contrary to pediatric samples, (12) EAH in adults is underexplored, (5, 13–17) particularly in the natural environment. (18) …”
Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) is under-explored in adults with obesity. In this study, 50 adults with obesity recorded eating episodes and theoretically-relevant environmental, perceptual, and emotional correlates in the natural environment for 2 weeks via ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Generalized linear models and mixed models were used to characterize correlates and consequences of EAH vs. non-EAH episodes/tendencies (within-subjects and between-subjects effects, respectively), time of day, and time of day × EAH interactions. Approximately 21% of EMA-recorded eating episodes involved EAH, and 70% of participants reported at least 1 EAH episode. At the within-person level, participants’ EAH episodes were associated with greater self-labeled overeating than their non-EAH episodes. At the between-person level, participants who tended to engage in more EAH reported less self-labeled overeating than those who engaged in less EAH. Across EAH and non-EAH episodes, eating in the evening was associated with overeating, expecting eating to be more rewarding, greater alcoholic beverage consumption, eating alone, eating because others are eating, and eating while watching television. Significant EAH × time of day interactions were also observed but the pattern of findings was not consistent. Findings suggest that EAH may be a relevant target for reducing food intake in individuals with obesity given its high prevalence and association with perceptions of overeating, although results should be extended using objective measures of food intake. Associations between evening eating episodes and perceptual and environmental factors should be further explored.
“…Feeding practices that reflect coercive control, such as pressuring children to eat, restricting children's access and consumption of unhealthy foods, and using food to influence children's behaviors or regulate their emotions, appear especially detrimental to the development of healthy eating patterns and weight (Lansigan, Emond, & Gilbert-Diamond, 2015;Shloim, Edelson, Martin, & Hetherington, 2015;Vaughn et al, 2016;Ventura & Birch, 2008). Cross-sectional and experimental studies have established associations between these feeding practices and increased child preference for restricted foods, heightened responsiveness to the presence of palatable foods, and eating beyond satiety when restricted foods are made available (Galloway, Fiorito, Francis, & Birch, 2006;Jansen et al, 2012).…”
“…In our other study conducted among 9-to 10-year-olds, 6 current BMI percentile was strongly related to consumption during the EAH phase, suggesting that we were observing an existing behavioral pattern that may have contributed to the children's current BMI percentile. There are known longitudinal associations between EAH behaviors and weight gain, 7,12 even among toddlers. 26 It is critical to next understand how exposures that can prime cued eating might influence the establishment of EAH behaviors prospectively.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Exposure to TV food advertisements prompts cued eating among schoolage children, 5 even after consuming a satiating meal. 6 This is concerning if such excess caloric consumption leads to excess weight gain 7 or primes a preference for energy-dense foods. 8 However, no study to date has tested whether food advertisements cue eating among preschool-age children.…”
BACKGROUND: Preschoolers in the United States are heavily exposed to unhealthy food advertisements. Whether such exposure promotes cued eating has not been documented in this age group.
METHODS:Randomized experiment among 60 children, aged 2 to 5 years, recruited in 2015-2016 from New Hampshire and Vermont. Children completed the experiment at a behavioral laboratory. Children were provided with a healthy snack to consume upon arrival then randomized to view a 14-minute TV program embedded with advertisements for either a food or a department store. Children were provided 2 snack foods to consume ad libitum while viewing the TV program; 1 of those snacks was the food advertised. Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) was operationalized as the kilocalories of snack foods consumed. t tests were used to compare EAH by advertisement condition; linear regression models assessed effect modification by the child's age, sex, BMI percentile, and parental feeding restriction.
RESULTS:Mean age was 4.1 (SD 0.9) years, 55% of children were male, 80% were nonHispanic white, and 20% were overweight or obese. There were no differences in child or socioeconomic characteristics by advertisement condition. Child BMI was not related to EAH. Mean kilocalories consumed during the EAH phase was greater among children exposed to the food advertisements (126.8, SD: 58.5) versus those exposed to the nonfood advertisements (97.3, SD: 52.3; P = .04), an effect driven by greater consumption of the advertised food (P < .01). There was no evidence of effect modification.
CONCLUSIONS:Findings suggest that food advertisement exposure may encourage obesogeniceating behaviors among the very young.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.