Understanding divergence of quantitative and qualitative data (or results) in mixed methods studies

Abstract

In mixed methods studies, novice researchers need to know that qualitative and quantitative data or results sometimes diverge. However, few studies focus on this aspect of mixed methods research. The present paper aims to review the literature on divergence of qualitative and quantitative evidence, and describe examples. The prior literature reveals four strategies for taking divergence into account: reconciliation, initiation, bracketing and exclusion. Nine examples derived from empirical studies were found, and they are described. Then, a detailed example is given of how divergence was identified and explored in a pilot study of the implementation of one electronic knowledge resource on handheld computer in an academic family medicine clinic. Finally, this worked example is described in the context of a teaching exercise for novice researchers.

The Quality of Automotive Industry: The Remote Monitoring Complex of the Quality of Enterprises Activity of Company Car Service System

“…Moreover, the tools implementation of remote monitoring of the quality creates the backgrounds for a much greater efficiency and for the possibility of adjusting the activities of service enterprises on the basis of identified deviations. The assumed concept also fits well into the current situation at the Russian market [10,11]. The constant growth of competition requires the optimization of expenses on provision of the main processes from automakers.…”

Mise à l’épreuve de la cartographie des concepts comme méthode intégrative d’identification et d’analyse d’un écosystème entrepreneurial

“…Des développements récents en matière de méthodes de recherche mixtes soulignent qu'il pourrait y avoir divergence entre les résultats quantitatifs et qualitatifs obtenus dans la mise en place d'un devis de recherche (Pluye, Grad, Levine et Nicolau, 2009 …”

Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews

“…Mixed studies reviews are relevant in public health, particularly with respect to complex and highly context-sensitive interventions (3). A mixed studies review entails the synthesis of data or results from studies with diverse designs (25,68). This emerging form of literature review can provide a rich and highly practical understanding of complex public health interventions and programs (70,82).…”