2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding disparities in community green accessibility under alternative green measures: A metropolitan-wide analysis of Columbus, Ohio, and Atlanta, Georgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vrijheid"s study (2020) also found that children who live in densely populated areas or neighborhoods with fewer recreational facilities have increased childhood obesity rates. A recent study looking at the communities of Columbus, Ohio and Atlanta, Georgia demonstrated that larger disparities in access to green space in inner suburbs was associated with income in Columbus and race in Atlanta (Park & Gulmann, 2020).…”
Section: Exercise/ Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vrijheid"s study (2020) also found that children who live in densely populated areas or neighborhoods with fewer recreational facilities have increased childhood obesity rates. A recent study looking at the communities of Columbus, Ohio and Atlanta, Georgia demonstrated that larger disparities in access to green space in inner suburbs was associated with income in Columbus and race in Atlanta (Park & Gulmann, 2020).…”
Section: Exercise/ Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocacy for increased provision of green and blue spaces in marginalised neighbourhoods has resulted in the unintended consequence of 'gentrifying' an area [56]. Research in the US confirms that this can make property and living costs prohibitive [57], thus further displacing or disabling access to green and blue spaces for minority and marginalised groups [57,58]. Equitable green space provision can be achieved if communities are engaged [59], and there are clearer policies regarding location, size, management, access and use [60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to work trips, high SES travelers portray essential travel to recreational facilities. During the lockdown, when all indoor facilities were closed except outdoor parks and trails (Keren 2020), high SES travelers had the advantage to visit these facilities due to better access (Cohen et al 2013;Park and Guldmann 2020). Hence, the high SES cluster opted for recreational facilities to relieve lockdown stress and visited them more frequently than usual (Keren 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of recreational facilities, neighborhoods with minority populations and low SES groups tend to have lower access to outdoor recreational facilities and green space (e.g., parks, trails, golf courses, trees, agricultural land) than well-off neighborhoods (Moore et al 2008;Park and Guldmann 2020). Cohen et al (2013) indicated that cities with the similar number of parks in different SES neighborhoods have lower park usage in low-income neighborhoods than others due to fewer park amenities and activity opportunities.…”
Section: Disparities In Non-work Travelmentioning
confidence: 99%