37th European Conference and Exposition on Optical Communications 2011
DOI: 10.1364/ecoc.2011.tu.5.b.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Discrete Linear Mode Coupling in Few-Mode Fiber Transmission Systems

Abstract: We present a preliminary investigation of system performance in the context of fewmode fiber propagation, focusing on the impact of discrete mode coupling, while varying key parameters, such as the differential mode group delay (DMGD), and employing (or not) source separation by MIMO signal processing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the mode coupling strength is increased, the net nonlinear penalty reduces, more rapidly for the low DMD fiber, confirming that mode coupling reduces the impact of nonlinearity as recently observed in [19], although the reduction in nonlinear penalty suggests that the reduction is due to a complex interaction of effects including cross mode nonlinearity, linear mode coupling and DSP convergence.. The net effect is thus dominated by linear mode coupling, and whilst this may, in principle, be compensated with an ideal receiver, it is un-compensable using practical blind DSP [10] as used in this paper. Having established that linear crosstalk dominates the performance for homogenous power allocation (equal power in each mode), in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the mode coupling strength is increased, the net nonlinear penalty reduces, more rapidly for the low DMD fiber, confirming that mode coupling reduces the impact of nonlinearity as recently observed in [19], although the reduction in nonlinear penalty suggests that the reduction is due to a complex interaction of effects including cross mode nonlinearity, linear mode coupling and DSP convergence.. The net effect is thus dominated by linear mode coupling, and whilst this may, in principle, be compensated with an ideal receiver, it is un-compensable using practical blind DSP [10] as used in this paper. Having established that linear crosstalk dominates the performance for homogenous power allocation (equal power in each mode), in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…crosstalk between spatially multiplexed signals, end-to-end group delay spread of signals, mode dependent loss/gain, etc [9]. Recently, a few preliminary reports analyzing propagation impairments considering both linear [10] and nonlinear coupling [6] have been reported, however the recent developments in spatially multiplexed systems demand not only a deeper and clearer understanding of coupling effects, but also their impact on system design choices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then six independent signals are generated to feed the three modes of the FMF and their two polarizations, where each tributary is modulated with QPSK at 28Gbaud data rate. The FMF model with discrete mode coupling used in our simulation is similar to the one presented in [10]. The DMGD is 27ps/km which is aligned with [2].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-22 dB mode coupling between LP 01 and LP 11 modes is assumed at both the mode multiplexer and demultiplexer [16]. The 6 × 6 FMF model is similar to the one in [26]. The DMGD is 35 ps/km, and random mode coupling is -34 dB/km with the coupling length of 10 km.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%