2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding differing outcomes from semantic and phonological interventions with children with word-finding difficulties: A group and case series study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors conclude that the phonological-semantic approach showed the greatest effectiveness, regardless of whether the delivery model was individual, in small or large groups. This meta-analysis confirmed the results of several empirical studies in elementary-aged children with DLD or learning a second language (Best et al, 2021;Bragard et al, 2012;St John and Vance, 2014) in showing that approaches which provide both semantic and phonological information about words yield the greatest effect sizes in intervention. In addition, four of the seven studies that combined the two approaches found generalization effects in the form of gains on standardized tests, such as picture naming, sentence completion, word finding following a definition, category naming, or forced-choice picture-word matching.…”
Section: Vocabulary Interventionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors conclude that the phonological-semantic approach showed the greatest effectiveness, regardless of whether the delivery model was individual, in small or large groups. This meta-analysis confirmed the results of several empirical studies in elementary-aged children with DLD or learning a second language (Best et al, 2021;Bragard et al, 2012;St John and Vance, 2014) in showing that approaches which provide both semantic and phonological information about words yield the greatest effect sizes in intervention. In addition, four of the seven studies that combined the two approaches found generalization effects in the form of gains on standardized tests, such as picture naming, sentence completion, word finding following a definition, category naming, or forced-choice picture-word matching.…”
Section: Vocabulary Interventionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Another reason to account for the results of Child 6, who displayed no difference between pre- and posttest for the school materials and vegetables lists, was that s/he was the youngest child of the class (6 years old), the most deficient in the language (including phonology) and the least proficient in reading. Thus, this child may not have benefited from the orthographic and phonological cues because of his/her severe phonological difficulties As Best et al (2021) suggested, outcomes are dependent on the degree of children's deficits. For example, children with phonological deficits will have more difficulty using phonological cues to construct vocabulary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on children with WF difficulties has suggested that problems could arise at different levels of the classic speech production models and non-word repetition may be a key task in the identification of the level of breakdown (Best et al 2021). Most studies have focused on a semantic or a phonological level of deficit for WF difficulties and have suggested that semantic or phonological profiles of WF difficulties may exist (Bragard et al 2012;German 2015;German et al 2012).…”
Section: Non-word Repetitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, non‐word repetition may be useful by allowing the examiner to determine if WF difficulties are due to problems at the phonological level (Best et al. 2021; Constable et al. 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%