Understanding Development Project Implementation: An Actor-Network Perspective

Abstract

SUMMARY Development projects are central to international development, yet the actual practice of their implementation is under‐researched. In particular, we know little about how practice affects project performance and about how politics is enacted within such projects. This paper investigates these knowledge gaps through analysis, using actor‐network theory (ANT), of a donor‐funded reform project in the Sri Lankan public sector. By analysing, using mobilisation, interaction and disintegration of the local and global actor‐networks that typically surround such development projects, the paper explains the project's trajectory. These actions represent the practice of politics that must, in turn, be understood in relation to network actor power: not through a static conception of ‘capacitive power’ but through the dynamic enacted concept of ‘associative power’. The paper concludes by reflecting on the contribution and limitations of ANT's local/global networks component in analysing development projects, and in providing insights for development project practice. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Translating Policies into Informal Settlements' Critical Services: Reframing, Anchoring and Muddling Through

“…This paper has contributed to bridge a gap in the policy implementation studies, bringing together literature on policy implementation practice (e.g. Long, ; Mosse, ; Rap, ;; Heeks and Stanforth, ) and organization studies (Zapata and Zapata Campos, , Czarniawska, ) by originally showing how policies and plans, or rather accounts of them, are adopted, translated and transformed by reframing, anchoring and muddling through (Czarniawska, ; ) practices. Reframing, anchoring and muddling through are not only three particular aspects of policy implementation practice.…”

“…Still, the policy implementation practice is under‐researched (Heeks and Stanforth, ; Mosse, ; ; Struyk, ; Umans, ). What occurs during implementation, how this process is related to policy outputs and how policies are adopted, translated and transformed among ministries, development agencies, consultants, project managers and beneficiaries, remain under‐scrutinized (Mosse, ; Rottenburg, ; Zapata and Zapata Campos, ).…”

Explaining global network emergence and nonemergence: Comparing the processes of network formation for tuberculosis and pneumonia

“…Networks are forms of social organization distinct from hierarchies and markets (Podolny & Page, ) characterized by a system of relationships between individuals and organizations to address a common goal (Saz‐Carranza & Ospina, ). A growing body of literature documents the impact of networks on global and domestic policymaking and implementation (Carpenter, ; Delaney, Van Der Haar, & Van Tatenhove, ; Heeks & Stanforth, ; Lecy et al, ). However, less is known about how and why these networks develop, why some issue networks form easily, and why others struggle to coalesce (Berry et al, ; Wachhaus, ).…”

“…However, less is known about how and why these networks develop, why some issue networks form easily, and why others struggle to coalesce (Berry et al, ; Wachhaus, ). A small body of prior research examines how networks begin (Hay & Richards, ; Heeks & Stanforth, ; Lake & Wong, ; Provan et al, ; Wachhaus, ). This research provides evidence that before a network forms, a population of individuals and organizations address an issue in relative isolation and hold different perspectives on how to advance the cause.…”

HRM in Development: Lessons and Frontiers

“…Baptiste () discusses organizational change and privatization of Trinidad & Tobago postal services involving HRM identifying core competencies in all jobs, recruiting a new cadre of professional staff, and improving performance review processes. In a recent example, based on a case from Sri Lanka, Heeks and Stanforth () recently discuss that project managers require skills for mobilizing and interacting with both local and global actor networks, involving practices of trust building and politics. These can be regarded as classic examples of HRM competencies of matching staffing requirements to mission, often with recruitment or compensation implications.…”