Understanding deforestation and forest fragmentation from a livelihood perspective

Abstract

Worldwide, forests provide a wide variety of resources to rural inhabitants, and especially to the poor. In Madagascar, forest resources make important contributions to the livelihoods of the rural population living at the edges of these forests. Although people benefit from forest resources, forests are continuously cleared and converted into arable land. Despite long-term efforts on the part of researchers, development cooperation projects and government, Madagascar has not been able to achieve a fundamental decrease in deforestation. The question of why deforestation continues in spite of such efforts remains. To answer this question, we aimed at understanding deforestation and forest fragmentation from the perspective of rural households in the Manompana corridor on the east coast. Applying a sustainable livelihood approach, we explored local social-ecological systems to understand: (i) how livelihood strategies leading to deforestation evolve and (ii) how the decrease of forest impacts on households' strategies. Results highlight the complexity of the environmental, cultural and political context in which households' decision-making takes place. Further, we found crucial impacts of deforestation and forest fragmentation on livelihood systems, but also recognized that people have been able to adapt to the changing landscapes without major impacts on their welfare. RÉSUMÉ Partout dans le monde les forêts fournissent une grande variété de ressources aux habitants des régions rurales, particulièrement aux plus pauvres. À Madagascar, les ressources forestières contribuent dans une grande mesure aux moyens d'existence des populations riveraines des forêts. Cependant, bien que les populations tirent parti des ressources de la forêt, les défrichements ne cessent pas et la conversion des zones boisées en terres cultivables se poursuit. Malgré les efforts entrepris depuis des années par les milieux de la recherche et du développement ainsi que par le gouvernement, Madagascar n'a pas encore connu d'inversion du rythme de la déforestation. Pourquoi les défrichements se poursuivent-ils en dépit des efforts entrepris ? C'est à cette question que nous souhaitons apporter une réponse en essayant de comprendre la déforestation et la fragmentation des forêts en prenant en compte les moyens d'existence des ménages ruraux dans le corridor de Manompana, côte Est de Madagascar. En tirant parti de la méthodologie SLA (sustainable livelihood approach), nous avons analysé les systèmes d'existence des populations locales dans le but de comprendre (i) comment évoluent les stratégies de vie impliquant la déforestation et (ii) quel est l'impact de la diminution des surfaces forestières sur les stratégies de vie des ménages. Les résultats mettent en évidence la complexité du contexte environnemental, culturel et politique dans lequel les ménages sont amenés à prendre leurs décisions. La déforestation et la fragmentation des forêts exercent des impacts cruciaux sur les moyens d'existence des ménages. Cependant, il apparait également que l...

Local Perspectives on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in a Forest Frontier Landscape in Myanmar

“…Further, it states that rubber as a single crop poses high risks to the livelihoods of local farmers. On the other hand, small-scale farmers often opt for diversification strategies [54] and their land use decisions are based not only on economic considerations but also on the environmental, cultural, and political context [55,56]. This has also been observed in our study area.…”

Remote sensing combined with social-ecological data: The importance of diverse land uses for ecosystem service provision in north-eastern Madagascar

“…All of these constraints were perceived by a higher percentage of households in mixed shifting than in mixed paddy landscapes. In the literature, shifting cultivation is perceived as less prone to crop damage from cyclones than irrigated rice production, which was often mentioned as a reason why this land use system is likely to persist in the region (Brimont et al, 2015;Kistler et al, 2001;Messerli and Pfund, 1999;Urech et al, 2015). However, in our case, cyclones were mentioned as a constraint mainly for shifting cultivation and to a lesser extent also for agroforestry.…”

“…The decrease in land available for shifting cultivation was another important constraint mentioned by a much higher proportion of land users in mixed shifting than in mixed paddy landscapes. Land users in our study region obtain the customary rights to use new land by slashing a plot of forest (Keller, 2008;Urech et al, 2015). The shrinking of large continuous forest areas and the expansion of protected areas leads to an unfulfilled demand for this ES formerly provided by forests.…”

“…While in many regions the drivers of deforestation have changed from local smallholders' subsistence needs to globalized demands for food and energy crops (DeFries et al, 2010;Gibbs et al, 2010;Lambin and Meyfroidt, 2011;van Vliet et al, 2012), the eastern coast of Madagascar presents a clear exception to this trend (Laney and Turner, 2015;Urech et al, 2015;Zaehringer et al, 2015). The largest remaining continuous surfaces of humid forest in Madagascar are still under threat, mainly due to agricultural expansion (Ganzhorn et al, 2001;Myers et al, 2000;Zaehringer et al 2015).…”

Biting the Bullet: Dealing with the Annual Hunger Gap in the Alaotra, Madagascar

“…This choice of expansion over intensification has numerous environmental implications. These include increasing deforestation and marshland conversion, both of which negatively affect the services these ecosystems provide, further impacting local populations' livelihoods and their natural capital asset base [14,37,[51][52][53]. Marsh access can further pose a threat to conservation: In Andreba Gare and Andilana Sud, where access to the marshes is easiest, off-season rice cultivation is more pronounced, and the remaining marsh ecosystems face rapid transformation [34,39].…”