2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding data fusion within the framework of coupled matrix and tensor factorizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, relation schemas are known in advance, while we are interested in inducing such relation schemas from unstructured text. A PARAFAC (Harshman, 1970) based method for jointly factorizing a matrix and tensor for data fusion was proposed in (Acar et al, 2013). In such cases, the matrix is used to provide auxiliary information (Narita et al, 2012;Erdos and Miettinen, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, relation schemas are known in advance, while we are interested in inducing such relation schemas from unstructured text. A PARAFAC (Harshman, 1970) based method for jointly factorizing a matrix and tensor for data fusion was proposed in (Acar et al, 2013). In such cases, the matrix is used to provide auxiliary information (Narita et al, 2012;Erdos and Miettinen, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They propose a new algorithm that fuses a user's social network graph with a user-item rating matrix using factor analysis based on probabilistic matrix factorisation in order to find more accurate recommendations. Some recent work on data fusion (Acar et al, 2013) has sought to understand when data fusion is useful and when the analysis of in-dividual data sources may be more advantageous. Data fusion approaches have become popular for heterogeneous data as they handle the process of integration of multiple data and knowledge from the same real-world object into a consistent, accurate, and useful representation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, fusion approaches (Boström et al, 2007;Acar et al, 2013) are often used to deal with this mix of data as they can combine diverse data sources even when they differ in terms of representation. Generally speaking, fusion approaches focus on the analysis of multiple matrices and formulate data fusion as a collective factorisation of matrices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we insert a prior on the neural-hemodynamic coupling into the problem formulation, which admits to co-estimate the true underlying HRF from the data itself. We achieve this combined goal of extracting neural-hemodynamic sources and their temporal coupling by expressing the problem as a coupled matrix-tensor factorization (CMTF) [16], [17], where the fMRI data is a matrix of time samples × voxels and the EEG spectrogram is represented as a 3 rd order tensor of time samples × electrodes × frequencies as in [15]. The factorizations of both datasets are then constrained by a shared factor matrix in the temporal mode, which is transformed by a convolution with an unknown HRF in the fMRI factorization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%