2013
DOI: 10.1177/0042098013512876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations

Abstract: In this paper we carry out a meta-analytic review of the literature on culture-led local development models. We identify and discuss three typical fallacies characterising mono-causal culture-led development schemes: instrumentalism, over-engineering, and parochialism. We then discuss their analytical background, and provide examples illustrating the consequences of each. Based upon this critical discussion, we make a case for a ‘new territorial thinking’ approach that takes into account the tangled hierarchy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
65
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Boyle, the festival has very successfully balanced community inclusiveness with a high standard of cultural content, avoiding what Sacco et al (2014) (drawing on Amartya Sen) refer to as cultural parochialism (original emphasis) (2814), where inclusion and participation can become the sole focus of the process at the expense of more instrumental and market-oriented content. However, the impact of austerity policies and cuts in key institutional funding in particular have meant that in its current format, wider opportunities for the festival are not immediately possible, and the question of whether and how it may decide to innovate to contribute further to local resilience and resourcefulness agendas (and whether this should become part of a strategic role for it) is a potential future debate for the festival and the locality it represents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Boyle, the festival has very successfully balanced community inclusiveness with a high standard of cultural content, avoiding what Sacco et al (2014) (drawing on Amartya Sen) refer to as cultural parochialism (original emphasis) (2814), where inclusion and participation can become the sole focus of the process at the expense of more instrumental and market-oriented content. However, the impact of austerity policies and cuts in key institutional funding in particular have meant that in its current format, wider opportunities for the festival are not immediately possible, and the question of whether and how it may decide to innovate to contribute further to local resilience and resourcefulness agendas (and whether this should become part of a strategic role for it) is a potential future debate for the festival and the locality it represents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the rise and wave of exploitation, or "culture-led regeneration", the cultural development game seems far from being a "win-win" one [5]. Cultural heritage is implicated in the complicated choices made by local and ordinary individuals in the face of political control and capital accumulation [6].…”
Section: Yuecheng's Dragon Mother Templementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, besides environmental and social sustainability, the Otaru approach can be taken as an interesting example of cultural sustainability e in the sense of maintaining the authenticity of the city's symbolic assets, to be regarded not as a reality to be preserved by preventing any instance of change, but as a reality that may evolve to a fair degree according to its intrinsic cultural transformational logic, rather than becoming instrumental to the accomplishment of extrinsic goals (e.g. Sacco, Ferilli, & Tavano Blessi, 2014).…”
Section: Further Increasing Local Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%