2018
DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0148-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding coupling dynamics of public transportation networks

Abstract: Subway and bus networks work as an integrated multiplex transportation system and play an indispensable role in modern big cities. Even though a variety of works have investigated the coupling dynamics of multiplex transportation networks, empirical data that validates the determinant coupling factors are still lacking. In this paper, we employ smartcard data of 2.4 million subway and bus passengers in Shenzhen, China to study the coupling dynamics of subway and bus networks. Surprisingly, the coupling of subw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the method of gradually moving some nodes or connecting edges in the road network is adopted to calculate and compare the changes of connectivity or traffic efficiency indexes of the whole road network before and after the change of road network structure; accordingly, the nodes or connecting edges which calculation results vary greatly are defined as the vulnerable parts of the road network. Usually, the performance parameters of complex topological network are selected as the connectivity index or traffic efficiency index of the road network, such as the degree, betweenness centrality, community structure, and cluster coefficient [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Based on these indicators to identify the VURN, although the results can identify the vulnerable part of the network to a certain extent, there are obvious defects in the practical application of the identification results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the method of gradually moving some nodes or connecting edges in the road network is adopted to calculate and compare the changes of connectivity or traffic efficiency indexes of the whole road network before and after the change of road network structure; accordingly, the nodes or connecting edges which calculation results vary greatly are defined as the vulnerable parts of the road network. Usually, the performance parameters of complex topological network are selected as the connectivity index or traffic efficiency index of the road network, such as the degree, betweenness centrality, community structure, and cluster coefficient [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Based on these indicators to identify the VURN, although the results can identify the vulnerable part of the network to a certain extent, there are obvious defects in the practical application of the identification results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal is usually based on topological indicators of the road network [7]. Road network topology surveys based on statistical indicators of complex networks have been a heated topic of debate in recent years [8,9,10]. These indicators are usually node-based methods [11] such as degree [12], centrality [13], community [14], clustering coefficients [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods have been developed to alleviate traffic congestion in different types of urban transportation networks (i.e. road networks, subway networks, and bus service networks) [3–10]. Given that road networks usually have the most complex network topologies and drivers have complicated route‐selection behaviours, traffic congestion problems have been mostly studied on road networks among different types of urban transportation networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%