2006
DOI: 10.1080/10810730600934633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Consumers' Health Information Preferences Development and Validation of a Brief Screening Instrument

Abstract: The impact of health communication is generally enhanced when it is targeted or tailored to the needs of a specific population or individual. In a segmentation analysis of the U.S adult population - using data from 2,636 respondents to a mail panel survey - we identified four segments of the adult population that vary significantly with regard to health information preferences based on their degree of engagement in health enhancement, and their degree of independence in health decision making. We also created … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others fail to find connections between these two variables (Baker, Wagner, Singer, & Bundorf, 2003;Dickerson et al, 2004;Flynn, Smith, & Freese, 2006;Fox & Raine, 2000), however, thus duplicating the discrepancy between information-seeking and decision-making preferences as reported in studies that were done before Internet health information became so prevalent. Despite these gaps in the literature, one fact has been well established: age is negatively associated with both information-seeking and decision-making preferences (Benbassat et al, 1998;Hill & Laugharne, 2006;Maibach, Weber, Massett, Hancock, & Price, 2006). Age-related changes in cognition (Finucane, Mertz, Slovic, & Scholze Schmidt, 2005) and emotional processing and motivation (Lockenhoff & Carstensen, 2007) have been shown to have effects on older adults' decision-making.…”
Section: Information-seeking and Decision-making Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Others fail to find connections between these two variables (Baker, Wagner, Singer, & Bundorf, 2003;Dickerson et al, 2004;Flynn, Smith, & Freese, 2006;Fox & Raine, 2000), however, thus duplicating the discrepancy between information-seeking and decision-making preferences as reported in studies that were done before Internet health information became so prevalent. Despite these gaps in the literature, one fact has been well established: age is negatively associated with both information-seeking and decision-making preferences (Benbassat et al, 1998;Hill & Laugharne, 2006;Maibach, Weber, Massett, Hancock, & Price, 2006). Age-related changes in cognition (Finucane, Mertz, Slovic, & Scholze Schmidt, 2005) and emotional processing and motivation (Lockenhoff & Carstensen, 2007) have been shown to have effects on older adults' decision-making.…”
Section: Information-seeking and Decision-making Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…That more than onethird of patients selected 'no/other health activity' shows that HEPRODIA provides a tool to differentiate between patients who are open for a discussion about smoking cessation and dietary and/or physical behavior change, and patients who want to deal with other topics during diabetes counseling. According to Maibach et al, [27] four different segments of respondents can be discerned based on their degree of engagement in health enhancement ('active' or 'passive') and their degree of independence in health decision making ('doctor-dependent' or 'independent'). It is relevant to investigate the extent to which the 'independent active' or 'independent passive' patient is open to consultative health decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an obvious difference in the amount of information that different people desire [17]. Young people, older people, and those scoring low on the Stable scale, frequently only desire practical information.…”
Section: Information On Illness or Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%