2018
DOI: 10.4018/ijec.2018070102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Collaborative Interaction for Varying Product Complexity

Abstract: Small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) often develop products collaboratively. Significant interaction among designers is critical to the success of any collaborative design session. There exist various tools for remotely located interactions, such as textual, video, audio, screen share modes with varied level of cost; however, often, SMEs are unable to afford them. This work aims to identify the most appropriate mode that are required for a successful collaborative design for a given product complexity. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in such a scenario, the data which is available is generally qualitative in nature and thus the support should be able to deal with such type of data (Lindahl, 2001). Developing new products is always considered as a demanding task and present new challenges for the designers (Kumar and Sarkar, 2018b). Therefore an ecodesign support should be able to integrate environmental considerations into the process of new product development (Olundh, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in such a scenario, the data which is available is generally qualitative in nature and thus the support should be able to deal with such type of data (Lindahl, 2001). Developing new products is always considered as a demanding task and present new challenges for the designers (Kumar and Sarkar, 2018b). Therefore an ecodesign support should be able to integrate environmental considerations into the process of new product development (Olundh, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%