Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania

Abstract

Background Measures of quality of care in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely include experience of care. This gap in service quality metrics may be driven by a lack of understanding of client and provider perspectives. Understanding these perspectives is a critical first step in not only improving metrics, but also in improving service delivery. This study identifies the items antenatal care (ANC) clients and health care providers in Tanzania associate with a quality ANC service and explores the experience of care domain from both client and provider perspectives. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with15 providers and 35 clients in Tanzania that included a free-listing activity to elicit items clients and providers associate with quality ANC services. We analyzed the free-listing for rank order and frequency to identify the most salient items, which were included in the second phase of data collection. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with a pile sort activity with the same 15 providers and 32 new clients to understand the importance of the items identified in the free-listing. We used a thematic analysis driven by the framework approach to analyze interview data. Results Both clients and providers perceived quality of ANC as being comprised of items related to experience of care, provision of care, and cross-cutting essential physical and human resources. The free-listing findings illuminated that the experience of care was equally important to clients and providers as the availability of physical and human resources and the content of the care delivered. In addition, clients and providers perceived that a positive patient care experience-marked by good communication, active listening, keeping confidentiality, and being spoken to politely-increased utilization of health services and improved health outcomes. Conclusions The experience of care in LMICs is an overlooked, yet critically important topic. Understanding the experience of care from those who receive and deliver services is key to measuring and improving the quality of ANC. Our research highlights the importance of incorporating experience of care into future quality improvement activities and quality measures. By doing so, we identify barriers and facilitating factors of practical use to policy-makers and governments in LMICs. Reducing maternal mortality has been a long-standing global priority. Monitoring progress towards reductions in mortality has often focused on measuring service coverage defined as the proportion of the population at risk that receives an intervention [1]. Although coverage measures are widely used in

Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania

“…This study’s findings also suggest that to provide more comprehensive measures of ANC quality some items could be added to SPAs and other facility surveys, particularly items related to the experience of care. While the global community is moving towards more person-centred care, data collected through health facility assessments is generally deficient in experience of care measures 47 48. This may be due to the lack of validated instruments available for measuring the experience of maternal health care 49.…”

Factors for Late Initiation of Antenatal Care in Kahama Municipal, Tanzania

“…Method used to conduct this study was Qualitative method using exploratory approach which was done with an intention to get better understanding of factors for late initiation of antenatal care in Kahama Municipal [14]. key informants were Pregnant women and health care providers.…”

Private Providers’ Experiences Implementing a Package of Interventions to Improve Quality of Care in Kenya: Findings From a Qualitative Evaluation

“…Further, a positive relationship between patients and providers that is marked by good rapport, empathic communication, active listening, and confidentiality, was reported to have increased utilization of health services and improved quality of care and health outcomes in LMICs. 9 Overall, improving quality of care increases the opportunity for patients' and facility-level outcomes with a focus on maximizing the utilization of health care services.…”

“… 6 – 8 Researchers have cited weak health system structural factors, such as longer waiting times and commodity stock-outs, among other compounded health system challenges affecting the quality of care in LMICs. 9 In terms of maternal, neonatal, and child health care, many women in LMICs lack comprehensive quality of care throughout pregnancy and delivery. 10 In Kenya, population-based research has shown that the poorest women received fewer essential services during ANC care and were 4 times more likely to deliver without a skilled attendant compared to those women in the wealthiest quintile.…”