Understanding citizen perceptions of AI in the smart city

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is embedded in a wide variety of Smart City applications and infrastructures, often without the citizens being aware of the nature of their “intelligence”. AI can affect citizens’ lives concretely, and thus, there may be uncertainty, concerns, or even fears related to AI. To build acceptable futures of Smart Cities with AI-enabled functionalities, the Human-Centered AI (HCAI) approach offers a relevant framework for understanding citizen perceptions. However, only a few studies have focused on clarifying the citizen perceptions of AI in the context of smart city research. To address this gap, we conducted a two-phased study. In the pre-study, we explored citizen perceptions and experiences of AI with a short survey (N = 91). Second, scenario-based interviews (N = 7) were utilized to gain in-depth insights of citizen perceptions of AI in the Smart City context. Five central themes were recognized: (1) I don’t like them monitoring me, (2) I want maximum gain for minimum effort, (3) I don’t want AI to mimic people, (4) I’ll avoid using AI if I consider the risk too high, and (5) I don’t need to be concerned about AI. These offer an idea of human-centered requirements worth considering while designing AI applications for future Smart Cities.

How Learners’ Trust Changes in Generative AI Over a Semester of Undergraduate Courses

“…This might be explained by the balance between gain and effort. Qualitative analysis revealed that users anticipate maximum gain for minimum efforts when using AI-based services (Lehtiö et al, 2023). In our study, it is possible that the participants considered their grades as "gain" from AIbased services and their learning process as "efforts".…”

The Global Whitewashing of Smart Cities: Citizens’ Perspectives

“…The potential for this was recognised as long ago as the 1960s, when Marshall McLuhan observed that "The age of [technology] is also the age of the unconscious and of apathy" [98]. Since then, there have been a number of important studies that have found that the extensive use of technology can reduce the cognitive awareness of humans and desensitise us to our environment [99,100]. Such studies strongly suggest that, as people yield more of their cognitive independence to their devices, in an effort to make their lives easier and better, the need and ability to interact with the environment, including other people, declines, along with our perception of our surroundings.…”

Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia

“…The impact of the implementation of smart city is still being studied, especially how people living in the city can accept and use the technology that has been implemented in the city. There are many factors that affect people's acceptance of the implementation of technology that occurs in their cities such as effort expectancy, self-efficacy, perceived privacy, perceived security, trust in technology and many more (Habib et al, 2020;Lehtiö et al, 2022). However, this research was focusing on five variables namely Actual System Use (AU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Attitude Toward Using (ATU), Behavioral Intention to Use (BIU), and Perceived Usefulness (PU).…”