Understanding circular economy awareness and practices in manufacturing firms

Abstract

Purpose: Circular Economy (CE) has evolved as a result of the growing environmental awareness, environmental legislation and the need for social responsibility. However, awareness levels of CE are not as high as expected and practices are further behind than they should be, with a significant lack of research around the subject in the literature. This study therefore attempts to examine the current state of awareness levels and the practices around CE in manufacturing firms. Moreover, the study aims to empirically validate one of the earlier proposed CE models. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopts a quantitative survey questionnaire based approach. More than 500 people from various manufacturing organisations were contacted directly over a 40-day long sampling process through the FAME database, personal contacts and LinkedIn. The survey resulted in 103 completed responses. Given the exploratory nature of the study, the data was mainly analysed using descriptive statistics. To validate the CE model, a correlation analysis was also conducted. Findings: The research findings show that with the growing emphasis on CE across the globe by governing bodies, firms are becoming more aware of CE practices. The analysis also shows some useful insights on the state of each of the pillars (economic benefits, environmental impact and resource scarcity) of CE. Our findings also indicate that the environmental impact pillar of CE is at a more developed state than the other two pillars which are-mostlyin a research state. Research Implications and Limitations: The study provides manufacturing firms with a thorough understanding of the state of CE practices and importance of its successful implementation. The findings of the study advocates consideration of all three pillars of CE by managers as a guide to plan for an efficient strategy around CE implementation. Moreover, our study adds to existing efforts by the academic community to raise the awareness towards CE practice among all relevant stakeholders. The findings of this study are based on the responses from a limited 103 survey responses from manufacturing firms. Originality/value: This study adds to the very limited empirical literature on CE awareness and practices in manufacturing firms. This is also one of the first studies attempting to empirically validate an existing CE model.

A Survey on Understanding the Perception and Awareness Towards a Circular Economy: A Comparative Study Between Nepal and the USA

“…Only 14.8% of the respondents chose financial motives for rationale behind changes in consumption patterns. These findings reconcile with the Liakos et al (2019) in that CE is still thought of as an environment protection strategy.…”

Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry

“…The IE theory says that the industrial system is a kind of ecosystem where the materials are distributed, while energy and information-flow take place through the assistance of the biosphere. Hence, IE argues that the industry and environment cannot be separated from each other (Erkman, 1997; Liakos et al , 2019).…”

The Importance of Higher Education in the EU Countries in Achieving the Objectives of the Circular Economy in the Energy Sector

“…Governments and regulators should adapt, for example, taxation to promote a circular economy in companies. Communication and information strategies are also needed to raise producers' and the public's awareness of CE [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. CE requires the adoption of new business models and the classical "reduce, reuse and recycle" approach.…”