Understanding Changes in Tumor Texture Indices in PET: A Comparison Between Visual Assessment and Index Values in Simulated and Patient Data

Abstract

The use of texture indices to characterize tumor heterogeneity from PET images is being increasingly investigated in retrospective studies, yet the interpretation of PET-derived texture index values has not been thoroughly reported. Furthermore, the calculation of texture indices lacks a standardized methodology, making it difficult to compare published results. To allow for texture index value interpretation, we investigated the changes in value of 6 texture indices computed from simulated and real patient data. Methods: Ten sphere models mimicking different activity distribution patterns and the 18 F-FDG PET images from 54 patients with breast cancer were used. For each volume of interest, 6 texture indices were measured. The values of texture indices and how they changed as a function of the activity distribution were assessed and compared with the visual assessment of tumor heterogeneity. Results: Using the sphere models and real tumors, we identified 2 sets of texture indices reflecting different types of uptake heterogeneity. Set 1 included homogeneity, entropy, short-run emphasis, and long-run emphasis, all of which were sensitive to the presence of uptake heterogeneity but did not distinguish between hyper-and hyposignal within an otherwise uniform activity distribution. Set 2 comprised high-gray-level-zone emphasis and low-gray-level-zone emphasis, which were mostly sensitive to the average uptake rather than to the uptake local heterogeneity. Four of 6 texture indices significantly differed between homogeneous and heterogeneous lesions as defined by 2 nuclear medicine physicians (P , 0.05). All texture index values were sensitive to voxel size (variations up to 85.8% for the most homogeneous sphere models) and edge effects (variations up to 29.1%). Conclusion: Unlike a previous report, our study found that variations in texture indices were intuitive in the sphere models and real tumors: the most homogeneous uptake distribution exhibited the highest homogeneity and lowest entropy. Two families of texture index reflecting different types of uptake patterns were identified. Variability in texture index values as a function of voxel size and inclusion of tumor edges was demonstrated, calling for a standardized calculation methodology. This study provides guidance for nuclear medicine physicians in interpreting texture indices in future studies and clinical practice. Ani ncreasing number of studies focus on the characterization of tumor heterogeneity based on texture analysis from CT, MRI, ultrasound images, and, since 2009, PET images (1). The calculation of tumor heterogeneity indices from medical images offers the benefits of being noninvasive, accounting for the whole tumor, and being repeatable during treatment. These indices, if proven, could be used to reliably identify the existence of subpopulations of cells with distinct genomic alterations and could guide the choice of treatment, especially for targeted therapeutics (2). In PET, several retrospective studies suggest that texture indices reflect ...

Combined FET PET/MRI radiomics differentiates radiation injury from recurrent brain metastasis

“…This should also include a better understanding of the link of specific radiomic features with the underlying pathophysiology, given that it is difficult to translate directly a mathematical description of a radiomic or textural feature into a visual impression or physiological meaning (Orlhac et al, 2017b). In our analysis, patients with brain metastasis recurrence showed a more heterogeneous contrast-enhancement and FET uptake (Fig.…”

Prediction of cervical cancer recurrence using textural features extracted from 18F-FDG PET images acquired with different scanners

“…As explained by Orlhac et al, the absolute resampling of SUV values avoids the volume dependence of textural features as opposed to relative resampling [28]. Another advantage of absolute resampling is the better distinction between tissues, and an intuitive variation in textural feature values [29]. Another team highlighted the impact of SUV discretization in such radiomic studies [30].…”

“…This region was supposed to be a homogeneous region of reference after systematic verification of the normal liver function [28]. Another parameter influencing textural feature values is the voxel size [29, 36]. G1 images were resampled on G2 grid (2.7 mm × 2.7 mm × 3.4 mm) and G2 images on G1 grid (5.3 mm × 5.3 mm × 3.4 mm) using bicubic interpolation.…”

Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications

“…[50][51][52]55 Finally, an attempt of interpreting PET textural indices was carried out in a very recent work, where heterogeneity quantified by texture analysis was investigated on simulated patient data. 58 Here, the authors found that homogeneity, entropy, short-run emphasis and long-run emphasis were sensitive to the presence of uptake heterogeneity, whereas high grey-level zone emphasis and low grey-level zone emphasis were mostly sensitive to the average uptake. All these indices were sensitive to the pixel size and edge effects.…”