Understanding Cardiology Practitioners’ Interpretations of Electrocardiograms: An Eye-Tracking Study

Abstract

Background Visual expertise refers to advanced visual skills demonstrated when performing domain-specific visual tasks. Prior research has emphasized the fact that medical experts rely on such perceptual pattern-recognition skills when interpreting medical images, particularly in the field of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. Analyzing and modeling cardiology practitioners’ visual behavior across different levels of expertise in the health care sector is crucial. Namely, understanding such acquirable visual skills may help train less experienced clinicians to interpret ECGs accurately. Objective This study aims to quantify and analyze through the use of eye-tracking technology differences in the visual behavior and methodological practices for different expertise levels of cardiology practitioners such as medical students, cardiology nurses, technicians, fellows, and consultants when interpreting several types of ECGs. Methods A total of 63 participants with different levels of clinical expertise took part in an eye-tracking study that consisted of interpreting 10 ECGs with different cardiac abnormalities. A counterbalanced within-subjects design was used with one independent variable consisting of the expertise level of the cardiology practitioners and two dependent variables of eye-tracking metrics (fixations count and fixation revisitations). The eye movements data revealed by specific visual behaviors were analyzed according to the accuracy of interpretation and the frequency with which interpreters visited different parts/leads on a standard 12-lead ECG. In addition, the median and SD in the IQR for the fixations count and the mean and SD for the ECG lead revisitations were calculated. Results Accuracy of interpretation ranged between 98% among consultants, 87% among fellows, 70% among technicians, 63% among nurses, and finally 52% among medical students. The results of the eye fixations count, and eye fixation revisitations indicate that the less experienced cardiology practitioners need to interpret several ECG leads more carefully before making any decision. However, more experienced cardiology practitioners rely on their skills to recognize the visual signal patterns of different cardiac abnormalities, providing an accurate ECG interpretation. Conclusions The results show that visual expertise for ECG interpretation is linked to the practitioner’s role within the health care system and the number of years of practical experience interpreting ECGs. Cardiology practitioners focus on different ECG leads and different waveform abnormalities according to their role in the health care sector and their expertise levels.

Humanizing AI in medical training: ethical framework for responsible design

“…Healthcare data is often biased due to the under-representation of certain populations in clinical trials and medical research. As it was demonstrated through ECG interpretation experiments (Tahri Sqalli et al, 2022b ), racial and ethnic minorities are often underrepresented in healthcare research, which can lead to biased algorithms that fail to consider the unique health needs and outcomes of these populations (Fletcher et al, 2021 ). Similarly, gender biases in healthcare data can lead to disparities in diagnosis and treatment for women (Fletcher et al, 2021 ).…”

Can Orthopaedic Surgeons adequately assess an Electrocardiogram (ECG) trace paper? A cross sectional study

“…Various studies in the literature evaluated the difference between specialized and non-specialized physicians regarding their ability in ECG evaluation and assessment knowledge [ [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] ]. Furthermore, the competency difference between seniors and juniors (different experience levels) within the same medical specialty was evaluated [ [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] ]. However, the literature on the ability and accuracy of surgeons, including Orthopaedic surgeons, in evaluating and interpreting ECGs is deficient [ 14 , 23 , 24 ].…”

A cardiologist-like computer-aided interpretation framework to improve arrhythmia diagnosis from imbalanced training datasets

“… 20 Compared with less experienced cardiologists, more experienced cardiologists rely on their skills to recognize the visual signal patterns of different cardiac abnormalities, providing a more accurate ECG interpretation. 21 …”