1997
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding, building and using ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
0
27

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
131
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…By committing to the same ontological specification, different applications share a common vocabulary with a formal language and clear semantics. Also, by representing knowledge with a well-established formalism [47], internal consistency and compliance checking can be performed in order to determine content adequacy.…”
Section: Classification Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By committing to the same ontological specification, different applications share a common vocabulary with a formal language and clear semantics. Also, by representing knowledge with a well-established formalism [47], internal consistency and compliance checking can be performed in order to determine content adequacy.…”
Section: Classification Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Haystack standard provides a predefined ontology for describing the building installations data. An ontology defines how elements are arranged in a hierarchy or structure and how these elements interact and relate to one another [7]. Elements have defined attribute values or sets of attributes.…”
Section: Data Virtualization For Cloud Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature contains many, partly contradicting definitions of an ontology. Guarina (1997) presented some of the definitions of ontology available in the literature and discussed the importance and the major limitations of the definitions.…”
Section: Systematic Representation Of the Knowledge Basementioning
confidence: 99%