Understanding biosecurity behaviors of Australian beef cattle farmers using the ten basic human values framework

Abstract

IntroductionOn-farm biosecurity is an essential component of successful disease management in the beef cattle industry on an individual, regional, and national level. Participation in mandatory or voluntary assurance schemes, knowledge and trusted relationships have all been demonstrated to contribute to the development of behaviors that promote biosecurity. However, compliance with rules, socio-psychological relationships and knowledge-seeking behavior are all contingent upon the motivations and beliefs of the individual. It is widely accepted that the motivations and beliefs of all cultures can be defined by ten basic values (Self-direction, Stimulation, Hedonism, Achievement, Power, Security, Conformity, Tradition, Benevolence and Universalism). In this study, we use the ten basic values to characterize the on-farm biosecurity behaviors of Australian beef farmers to facilitate the identification of interventions that are most likely to align with producer motivations and therefore, more likely to result in wider adoption of effective on-farm biosecurity.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 Australian beef farmers to discuss the reasons behind decisions to alter or implement biosecurity practices in response to endemic diseases. Thematic analysis was used to identify the motivations, opportunities, and capability of biosecurity behaviors. The ten basic human values were used to characterize these behaviors and inform enablers and barriers to biosecurity adoption.Results and discussionBenevolence and Self-direction, relating to self-transcendence and an openness to change, were the principal values associated with good biosecurity behaviors. This suggests that farmers will be receptive to education strategies that communicate the actual risk of disease in their area, the impact of disease on animal welfare, and the ability for on-farm biosecurity to mitigate these impacts. Farmers also expressed values of Security which entrenched behaviors as common practice; however, in some cases the Security of trusted relationships was identified as a potential barrier to behavior change. Overall, values associated with biosecurity behaviors were found to align with values that are most important for social cohesion, suggesting that collaborative disease efforts between industry stakeholders and farmers are likely to succeed if designed with these values in mind.

Factors within A Veterinarian-Cattle Farmer Relationship That May Impact on Biosecurity Being Carried out on Farms: An Exploratory Study

“…Without farmers fully comprehending biosecurity information, implementation is unlikely to be accurate [ 19 ] and, therefore, ineffective. Additionally, a farmer actively engaging in conversation with their vet allows for shared decision-making in the planning of biosecurity measures specific to that farm [ 37 , 52 ]. This also links to the theme of “Getting to know each other ” because an actively involved cattle farmer also offers information about the farm to their vet, which allows for the vet to tailor biosecurity to the specific farm in question.…”

Public Health Awareness of Zoonosis through Veterinary Profession

“…The subjects covered in these courses include zoonotic agents, routes of transmission, diagnostics, and preventive approaches. Aspiring veterinarians are better equipped to handle zoonotic difficulties when they join the field by fostering zoonosis knowledge early in their education (Fountain et al 2023).…”

Human Dimensions in an Animal Disease Reporting System: A Scoping Review Protocol and Pilot Mapping to Behavioral Frameworks

“…Behavioral theories provide an explanation of the structural and psychological mechanisms believed to control behavior and changes in behavior [13]. Garza et al [14], Barnes et al [15], and Fountain et al [16] utilized behavioral theories such as the nudge theory and Schwartz's theory of basic human values to assess strategies used to increase compliance with animal biosecurity measures and disease reporting to safeguard the health of animals. These studies generally found that the use of behavioral theories was beneficial for increasing the range of interventions that could be considered to effect behavior change and increasing the effectiveness of interventions chosen to improve animal health.…”