Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Maternal Immunization: A Systematic Narrative Synthesis of the Published Literature

Abstract

Introduction Vaccines are being developed against Group B Streptococcus and respiratory syncytial virus. These vaccines are designed to be given to pregnant women to protect infants; thus, their success depends on uptake in this population. Maternal immunization programs have struggled to achieve target coverage rates. This systematic narrative synthesis aims to define the most important barriers and facilitators for maternal immunization and to identify priority areas for future research. Methods A search strategy was developed in Medline and adapted according to the requirements of additional search engines. Two reviewers independently reviewed the studies, using pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results sections of included studies were coded, and thematic analysis was used to identify prominent themes. Results 321 studies were included in the final review. Most studies came from North America (37%), Europe (26%) or East Asia, Australia and New Zealand (22%). Low-and middle-income countries were under-represented. Five percent of studies came from Sub-Saharan Africa, and 2% came from South Asia. The prominent factors impacting maternal immunization were provider recommendation, perceived risks and benefits of maternal vaccines for the infant, race, birthplace, and access to healthcare. Few studies explored reasons behind racial and socioeconomic disparities in maternal immunization rates. Discussion A strong provider recommendation, equitable access to prenatal care and messaging that focuses on vaccine safety and infant benefits emerged as the key components for optimising vaccine uptake among pregnant women. Research among healthcare providers, minority groups and in low- and-middle-income countries was lacking. In anticipation of the expansion of maternal immunization programmes, focused research is needed to address these gaps and inform a successful public health strategy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10995-022-03508-0.

Barriers to and facilitators of populational adherence to prevention and control measures of COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases: a qualitative evidence synthesis

“…The lack of HCP recommendations to take the vaccine emerged as a high confidence barrier to adherence. This finding is consistent with other reports [111][112][113][114]. From the perspective of HCPs, the lack of recommendations is explained by anticipation of patient/parental concerns or refusal, time constraints and lack of clear guidelines and costs [115].…”

“…[ 120 ] pointed out that clinicians and nurses are the most reliable source of vaccine information for most people. In addition, several reviews indicate HCPs as inducers of vaccination [ 112 , 113 , 117 , 121 – 124 ]. Trust in recommendations from health, political and religious authorities was also considered a facilitator of adherence to nonpharmaceutical measures in this review.…”

“Figuring stuff out myself” – a qualitative study on maternal vaccination in socially and ethnically diverse areas in England

“…Others felt that for Covid-19 vaccines, pregnant women had been made a priority far too late. Carefully framed messages should also emphasize the benefits of maternal influenza and Covid-19 vaccines for the baby [ 68 ]. We found that generally only maternal pertussis vaccines were portrayed as benefiting the infant, in keeping with a study conducted in 2018 [ 38 ].…”

Preparing for Group B Streptococcus vaccine. Attitudes of pregnant women in two countries

“…A literature review informed attribute and level selection. 15 Attributes were chosen with the aim of investigating vaccine-specific factors that could impact uptake. Chosen levels aimed to reflect real-life scenarios.…”