2013
DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2013.799414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Attitudes Toward the Control of Nonnative Wild and Feral Mammals: Similarities and Differences in the Opinions of the General Public, Animal Protectionists, and Conservationists in New Zealand (Aotearoa)

Abstract: Lethal control is used extensively in New Zealand to control nonnative nonhuman mammals. Respondents were surveyed about 8 mammal groups considered pests and their attitudes toward their control and pest status. They also identified the most appropriate method of control for the 8 different mammals. Information was gathered from 3 groups of respondents: nonhuman animal protectionists, conservationists, and the general public. Conservationists routinely rated all animal groups as more severe pests than the gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shift from 1994 to 2012 for control over extermination of rabbits might reflect a high-profile, illegal biological control introduction (rabbit haemorrhagic disease) between surveys in 1997 which significantly reduced rabbit densities (Cooke & Fenner 2002). As others have found, introduced predators and small herbivores now have the highest pest status in New Zealand (Farnworth et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The shift from 1994 to 2012 for control over extermination of rabbits might reflect a high-profile, illegal biological control introduction (rabbit haemorrhagic disease) between surveys in 1997 which significantly reduced rabbit densities (Cooke & Fenner 2002). As others have found, introduced predators and small herbivores now have the highest pest status in New Zealand (Farnworth et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overlapping subsets of New Zealanders value different aspects of native biodiversity, and consequently allocate differing degrees of 'pestiness' to introduced (and sometimes native) species that they perceive to be affecting these values (Farnworth et al 2014). However, New Zealanders view conservation of native biodiversity as a 'public good' and have a high willingness to pay to minimise or mitigate the threats from pests to the surviving native ecosystems and species.…”
Section: Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, evidence that cats may have some beneficial effects (e.g. suppressing smaller predatory mammals) has led to disparate views among people with different attitudes towards animals (van Heezik 2010;Loyd and Hernandez 2012;Farnworth et al 2014). Only in the past 13 years have investigations of cats within New Zealand's urban environment, and their potential effects, been published (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite much research in New Zealand on the impacts of unowned cats in rural locations, the impact of owned cats on wildlife in urban locations is a matter of vigorous public debate, and one that may be hard to resolve, given that conservationists and those involved with (companion) animal-welfare organisations can have diametrically opposed viewpoints (Farnworth et al 2014). Studies on other impacts of cats, such as disease transmission and the emotional value of pet cats in New Zealand to their owners, are also limited (but see Farnworth et al 2011;Roe et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation