1998
DOI: 10.1002/oti.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding assessment concepts within the occupational therapy context

Abstract: This paper explores therapists' perceptions about issues of validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ottenbacher and Tomcheck (1993), in a review of occupational therapy literature, demonstrate the inadequate use of measures of agreement when examining the reliability of assessments. In addition, there seems to be some confusion with terminology and understandings of reliability coefficients with assessment users (Asher, 1996;Clemson & Fitzgerald, 1998). This suggests we should endeavor to clarify how the statistics should be interpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ottenbacher and Tomcheck (1993), in a review of occupational therapy literature, demonstrate the inadequate use of measures of agreement when examining the reliability of assessments. In addition, there seems to be some confusion with terminology and understandings of reliability coefficients with assessment users (Asher, 1996;Clemson & Fitzgerald, 1998). This suggests we should endeavor to clarify how the statistics should be interpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%