2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding architecture age and style through deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model in this study, named FacMixNet, integrates a shared feature extraction architecture for the dual prediction of building age and built form two attributes that are conventionally classified separately. , The novel multitask learning framework posits the potential interrelation of features used for both age and built form recognition, as depicted in Figure Panel B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model in this study, named FacMixNet, integrates a shared feature extraction architecture for the dual prediction of building age and built form two attributes that are conventionally classified separately. , The novel multitask learning framework posits the potential interrelation of features used for both age and built form recognition, as depicted in Figure Panel B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, comparing the accuracy with that achieved in the previous study demonstrated significant improvement over the results of using accurate Japanese real estate images with built-year and building-structure classifications of 0.367 and 0.786, respectively [17]. A previous study using SVI data achieved an accuracy of 0.869-0.871 in material classification in Chile [25] and an accuracy of 0.614 and 0.81 in built age classification in Austria and in Amsterdam, respectively [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30].…”
Section: B Classification Of the Built Year And Structure Of Individu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When GIS building data and SVIs are combined for a highdensity area (such as an urban area), simply linking the nearest building and shooting point may not help to annotate the building accurately if the vehicle's travel direction and AOV are not considered. Previous studies used images recorded with the camera direction perpendicular to the travel direction, and this helped calculate the compass direction of each detected building easily based on its relative position in the image [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. However, a 360°SVI in a high-density building area cannot correctly annotate the buildings with GIS building data because the buildings are densely packed.…”
Section: A Automated Annotation For the Development Of Training Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, street view imagery prevails in understanding the urban physical construction environment and human habitat perception 22 , 23 . This data records abundant and various housing features from the pedestrian perspective, and are used to extract not only the physical objectives like housing height, density, and greening level 24 27 , but also indicators of subjective cognition of habitat comfortability, building style and street quality via computer vision and AI techniques 28 31 . All in all, street view imagery is viable for housing quality assessment of individual house automatically and at a large scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%