2003
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Abstract: In reporting Implicit Association Test (IAT) results, researchers have most often used scoring conventions described in the first publication of the IAT (A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, & J. L. K. Schwartz, 1998). Demonstration IATs available on the Internet have produced large data sets that were used in the current article to evaluate alternative scoring procedures. Candidate new algorithms were examined in terms of their (a) correlations with parallel self-report measures, (b) resistance to an artifact assoc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

95
5,070
9
102

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,608 publications
(5,281 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
95
5,070
9
102
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants' bias towards an incomplete or complete body was measured by the response time and accuracy of categorizing the pictures with a positive concept relative to a negative concept. The IAT consisted of seven blocks (Greenwald et al, 2003),. All stimuli were displayed in the middle of a central white rectangle with the dimensions of 540 × 540 pixels (Fig.…”
Section: General Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants' bias towards an incomplete or complete body was measured by the response time and accuracy of categorizing the pictures with a positive concept relative to a negative concept. The IAT consisted of seven blocks (Greenwald et al, 2003),. All stimuli were displayed in the middle of a central white rectangle with the dimensions of 540 × 540 pixels (Fig.…”
Section: General Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of completed surveys, 12 were excluded for being pediatric cardiologists, and 53 were excluded for having an invalid IAT score (based on high errors rates) 29. The characteristics of those included versus excluded for IAT errors were not statistically different (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the D score, the higher the implicit gender bias of associating strength or risk taking with men more than women, with negative numbers indicating a reversal in bias. For descriptive purposes, IAT D scores were categorized into standard classifications (no, slight, medium, or high bias) 29. Break points for slight (D=0.15), medium (D=0.35), and high (D=0.65) were selected conservatively according to psychological conventions for effect size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The D transformation serves to minimize the impact of individual variability relating to extraneous variables such as age, cognitive ability, and/or motor skills, offering a cleaner response-latency paradigm measurement [38]. To facilitate interpretation of the results and comparability of evaluative responses toward self vs. others, the computed D-IRAP 'others are' trial scores were reverse-scored prior to statistical analysis.…”
Section: Irap Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%