Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills

Abstract

BackgroundConsumers are increasingly exposed to comparative healthcare information (information about the quality of different healthcare providers). Partly because of its complexity, the use of this information has been limited. The objective of this study was to examine how the amount of presented information influences the comprehension and use of comparative healthcare information when important consumer characteristics and skills are taken into account.MethodsIn this randomized controlled experiment, comparative information on total hip or knee surgery was used as a test case. An online survey was distributed among 800 members of the NIVEL Insurants Panel and 76 hip- or knee surgery patients. Participants were assigned to one of four subgroups, who were shown 3, 7, 11 or 15 quality aspects of three hospitals. We conducted Kruskall-Wallis tests, Chi-square tests and hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses to examine relationships between the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills (literacy, numeracy, active choice behaviour) on one hand, and outcome measures related to effectively using information (comprehension, perceived usefulness of information, hospital choice, ease of making a choice) on the other hand.Results414 people (47%) participated. Regression analysis showed that the amount of information slightly influenced the comprehension and the perceived usefulness of comparative healthcare information. It did not affect consumers’ hospital choice and ease of making this choice. Consumer characteristics (especially age) and skills (especially literacy) were the most important factors affecting the comprehension of information and the ease of making a hospital choice. For the perceived usefulness of comparative information, active choice behaviour was the most influencing factor.ConclusionThe effects of the amount of information were not unambiguous. It remains unclear what the ideal amount of quality information to be presented would be. Reducing the amount of information will probably not automatically result in more effective use of comparative healthcare information by consumers. More important, consumer characteristics and skills appeared to be more influential factors contributing to information comprehension and use. Consequently, we would suggest that more emphasis on improving consumers’ skills is needed to enhance the use of comparative healthcare information.

What Influences Patients' Decisions When Choosing a Health Care Provider? Measuring Preferences of Patients with Knee Arthrosis, Chronic Depression, or Alzheimer's Disease, Using Discrete Choice Experiments

“…This is consistent with earlier findings indicating that, although there is no such thing as the patient in this context, there is a diversity of choice profiles which emerges when searching for and selecting a health care provider (Groenewoud, Kreuger, and Van Exel ; Zwijnenberg et al. ). We therefore argue that the development of effective consumer information requires a tailor‐made approach to provide groups of patients with convenient and relevant comparative quality information about care providers.…”

Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas

“…Health services researchers may assess whether or not the delivery of PtDAs on the Internet fosters increased health equity for disadvantaged communities, chronic care, surrogate decision makers, isolated adults (e.g., individuals with mobility disabilities, home-bound older adults), and/or dispersed families [20,59,65,66]. Investigators in implementation science and translational research may seek to determine the best practices for using Internet-based PtDAs to deliver “the right support to the right patient at the right time” [69-71].…”

Patients' Perspectives of Care and Surgical Outcomes in Michigan

“…19, 20 Additionally, the interpretation of quality metrics is highly variable with age, literacy and knowledge of healthcare having huge implications for choice. 21 The importance of hospital choice for major operations obligates the surgical community to improve delivery and sharpen the focus of hospital quality metrics.…”