Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development

Abstract

While substantial effort has been invested in making robots more reliable, experience demonstrates that robots operating in unstructured environments are often challenged by frequent failures. Despite this, robots have not yet reached a level of design that allows effective management of faulty or unexpected behavior by untrained users. To understand why this may be the case, an in-depth literature review was done to explore when people perceive and resolve robot failures, how robots communicate failure, how failures influence people's perceptions and feelings toward robots, and how these effects can be mitigated. Fifty-two studies were identified relating to communicating failures and their causes, the influence of failures on human-robot interaction (HRI), and mitigating failures. Since little research has been done on these topics within the HRI community, insights from the fields of human computer interaction (HCI), human factors engineering, cognitive engineering and experimental psychology are presented and discussed. Based on the literature, we developed a model of information processing for robotic failures (Robot Failure Human Information Processing, RF-HIP), that guides the discussion of our findings. The model describes the way people perceive, process, and act on failures in human robot interaction. The model includes three main parts: (1) communicating failures, (2) perception and comprehension of failures, and (3) solving failures. Each part contains several stages, all influenced by contextual considerations and mitigation strategies. Several gaps in the literature have become evident as a result of this evaluation. More focus has been given to technical failures than interaction failures. Few studies focused on human errors, on communicating failures, or the cognitive, psychological, and social determinants that impact the design of mitigation strategies. By providing the stages of human information processing, RF-HIP can be used as a tool to promote the development of user-centered failure-handling strategies for HRIs.

Trouble and Repair in Child–Robot Interaction: A Study of Complex Interactions With a Robot Tutee in a Primary School Classroom

“…opportunities for children to differentiate between social vs. technical issues, making it futile to discuss these differences from an interaction perspective. Our findings resonate with an earlier literature review on failure in HRI (Honig and Oron-Gilad, 2018). Indeed, all sources of trouble identified in the current study have been observed in HRI before, albeit with the obvious contextual variations.…”

Taxonomy of Trust-Relevant Failures and Mitigation Strategies

“…Mitigation of User Failures. Our discussions identified the category of intentional and unintentional User Failures as up-to-now understudied with respect to mitigation strategies [41]. Mainly how robots could react if people intentionally cause errors, e.g.…”

The Effect of Social Presence and Chatbot Errors on Trust

“…Regarding perceived competence, Honig and Oron-Gilad [49] showed that an erroneous anthropomorphic avatar lowers the customer's trust and the service encounter satisfaction. Moreover, their willingness to use the service again and to purchase goods depends on the recovery strategies: a compensation strategy is more efficient in improving the service encounter satisfaction, while the option or apology strategies are better at increasing willingness to use the service again.…”