2005
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and optimizing the amplitude modulated control for multiple‐slice continuous arterial spin labeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a representative T 1sat of 0.86 seconds, similar to that used by Utting et al (2005). The pH-weighted image was derived as CEST ratio asymmetry (CESTR asym ), which calculates the difference between label and reference images, normalized by the control scan (I 0 ) per voxel as ( CESTR asym ¼ ðI ref À I label Þ=I 0 ).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a representative T 1sat of 0.86 seconds, similar to that used by Utting et al (2005). The pH-weighted image was derived as CEST ratio asymmetry (CESTR asym ), which calculates the difference between label and reference images, normalized by the control scan (I 0 ) per voxel as ( CESTR asym ¼ ðI ref À I label Þ=I 0 ).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Vascular and fat-suppression modules were also used with a labeling pulse duration of 3 seconds. Postlabeling delay and the gap between the labeling plane and the central imaging plane were 300 and 20 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Mr Imaging Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest of the sequence parameters were identical to those used for pseudocontinuous ASL data acquisition. 18 The typical total scan time of ASL was ϳ10 minutes.…”
Section: Mr Imaging Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations