2010
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Modulating Opalescence and Viscosity in a Monoclonal Antibody Formulation

Abstract: Opalescence and high viscosities can pose challenges for high concentration formulation of antibodies. Both phenomena result from protein-protein intermolecular interactions that can be modulated with solution ionic strength. We studied a therapeutic monoclonal antibody that exhibits high viscosity in solutions at low ionic strength (~20 centipoise (cP) at 90 mg/mL and 23°C) and significant opalescence at isotonic ionic strength (approximately 100 nephelometric turbidity units at 90 mg/mL and 23°C). The interm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
152
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(62 reference statements)
16
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solution conditions can often be manipulated to minimize the protein self-interactions. 1,[7][8][9][10][11]13 The data reported here show that formulation pH and ionic strength had a large effect on gelation. No gelation was seen at pH below 5.5 and all samples formulated at pH greater than or equal to 6.0 gelled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solution conditions can often be manipulated to minimize the protein self-interactions. 1,[7][8][9][10][11]13 The data reported here show that formulation pH and ionic strength had a large effect on gelation. No gelation was seen at pH below 5.5 and all samples formulated at pH greater than or equal to 6.0 gelled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Aggregation, precipitation, crystallization, liquid-liquid phase separation, opalescence and high viscosity are all manifestations of self-interactions that can be promoted by high antibody concentration. 1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The different outcomes are due to the nature of the forces dominating the interactions (electrostatic, hydrophobic, short range attraction) and specific solution conditions. 4 These phenomena differ fundamentally from rapid heat-or chemically-induced aggregation or precipitation in that the intermolecular interactions can be reversed by changing the solution conditions such as pH, ionic strength, temperature or excipients, suggesting that a native or near-native protein conformation is maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is problematic because weak antibody self-and cross-interactions are often responsible for aggregation and polyreactivity, respectively. 6,7,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19] Nevertheless, numerous assays such as self-interaction chromatography (SIC) [20][21][22][23][24][25] and cross-interaction chromatography (CIC) [26][27][28] have been designed to identify these possibly troublesome antibodies early in the discovery program to avoid downstream issues. In these chromatography assays, increased retention of mAbs passing through a column conjugated with identical mAbs or a pool of polyclonal serum antibodies is indicative of attractive self-or cross-interactions, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, antibodies have high viscosity near their isoelectric point (pI) values at low ionic strength conditions. 2,10 Furthermore, negative charge-based descriptors 1,3,7,9,11 have shown good correlation with the viscosity of highly concentrated solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%