Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates

Abstract

Introduction: Reporting confidence intervals in scientific articles is important and relevant for evidence-based practice. Clinicians should understand confidence intervals in order to determine if they can realistically expect results similar to those presented in research studies when they implement the scientific evidence in clinical practice. The aims of this masterclass are: (1) to discuss confidence intervals around effect estimates; (2) to understand confidence intervals estimation (frequentist and Bayesian approaches); and (3) to interpret such uncertainty measures. Content: Confidence intervals are measures of uncertainty around effect estimates. Interpretation of the frequentist 95% confidence interval: we can be 95% confident that the true (unknown) estimate would lie within the lower and upper limits of the interval, based on hypothesized repeats of the experiment. Many researchers and health professionals oversimplify the interpretation of the frequentist 95% confidence interval by dichotomizing it in statistically significant or non-statistically significant, hampering a proper discussion on the values, the width (precision) and the practical implications of such interval. Interpretation of the Bayesian 95% confidence interval (which is known as credible interval): there is a 95% probability that the true (unknown) estimate would lie within the interval, given the evidence provided by the observed data.

Adolescent Problem Gambling in Rural Ghana: Prevalence and Gender Differentiation

“…The data analysis proceeded in three stages; at each stage, we stratified the data by gender (female and male), guided by the aims of the study. Firstly, we performed descriptive analysis of the data by applying frequencies, proportions and the frequentist 95% confidence intervals (CI) (Hespanhol et al 2019 ) to assess the uncertainty around the effect estimates of the difference in proportions (DP) between female and male adolescents in terms of social demographic variables and the 12-month prevalence estimates of problem gambling. In stage two, given the categorical nature of the data, we applied the Pearson’s Chi-squared test ( to explore the bivariate relationships between problem gambling and each of the socio-demographic variables, personal factors and the variables of social adversity included in the study.…”

Twenty-five years after the introduction of Evidence-based Medicine: knowledge, use, attitudes and barriers among physiotherapists in Italy — a cross-sectional study

“…We believe that research can help to increase the dissemination of knowledge about and the adoption of EBP among physiotherapists. A focus for future research should be to concentrate efforts in conducting high-quality research and teaching master classes devoted to EBP topics 44 and promoting research learning programmes as knowledge translation interventions to improve the use of EBP and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in physiotherapy. 45 CPGs, defined as 'systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances' (definition adopted by the European Region of the World Confederation for Physiotherapy), can be used to bridge the research to practice gap and promote EBP and present research findings to clinicians in a synthetic format without missing any elements of the EBP model.…”

Exploring the Impact of Multitemporal DEM Data on the Susceptibility Mapping of Landslides

“…Therefore, the confidence interval of the average value is − / , + / , where = / is the corresponding standard score. In general, the confidence probability in the literature [42,45,46] is 90% or 95%, and / is 1.645 or 1.96, respectively.…”