2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01637.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Estimating Effective Population Size for Practical Application in Marine Species Management

Abstract: Effective population size (N e ) determines the strength of genetic drift in a population and has long been recognized as an important parameter for evaluating conservation status and threats to genetic health of populations. Specifically, an estimate of N e is crucial to management because it integrates genetic effectsPalabras Clave: deriva génica, metapoblación, método temporal, N e contempóranea, N e endogámica, N e varianza, proporción N e /N selección,suplementación basada en criaderos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
338
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(121 reference statements)
7
338
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective population size estimates are strongly influenced by the mutation rate, with underestimation of rates resulting in large overestimates in population size (Luikart et al, 2010). In general, N ef is most difficult to estimate in large populations with moderate gene flow and this difficulty can lead to extremely large confidence intervals as are seen in our estimates (Hare et al, 2011). In this context, we suggest that our estimates of N ef should be considered as indicative of a large population with no bottleneck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Effective population size estimates are strongly influenced by the mutation rate, with underestimation of rates resulting in large overestimates in population size (Luikart et al, 2010). In general, N ef is most difficult to estimate in large populations with moderate gene flow and this difficulty can lead to extremely large confidence intervals as are seen in our estimates (Hare et al, 2011). In this context, we suggest that our estimates of N ef should be considered as indicative of a large population with no bottleneck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A conservation strategy of high relevance in fisheries is supportive breeding (Hare et al, 2011), where a population is typically divided into a captive and a wild group and the offspring of the captive group are released into the wild habitat to mix with the offspring from the wild group. Because the captive group (permanent or transitional) is bred to produce a lot of offspring that are released into the wild group at each generation, the variance in family size is greatly elevated artificially and thus the N e of the entire population is reduced.…”
Section: Effective Population Size In Conservation Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those criteria are not met with the great scallop and as a consequence using and interpreting most Ne estimates should be carried out with caution. Moreover, the possibility of substantial immigration in the population could further bias estimates, as gene flow could have different impacts on different estimators (see Gilbert and Whitlock (2015), for a comprehensive analysis; for more details on the differences between estimation methods, see Barker (2011), Hare et al (2011), Phillipsen et al (2011 and Holleley et al (2014)). …”
Section: Effective Population Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%