2004
DOI: 10.1080/0963928042000306800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement

Abstract: Previous research indicates that age, gender, and prior academic achievement have direct effects on students' approaches to learning and their academic performance and progression. Here an investigation is reported which explores the relationships between 60 first-year undergraduate accounting and business economics students' approaches to learning, their age, gender, prior academic achievement, and their subsequent academic performance and progression. Linear regression analyses identified the strongest predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
154
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
17
154
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The strategic approach was found to be negatively related to the surface approach (r=-0.19) and positively related to the deep approach (r=0.44). Both relationships were statistically significant (p<0.01) and consistent with prior literature (Duff 2004b;Gordon and Debus 2002;Zhu et al 2008). In addition, there was a statistically significant, negative relationship between the students' deep approach and factor 1 (r=-0.18).…”
Section: Reliability and Correlationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The strategic approach was found to be negatively related to the surface approach (r=-0.19) and positively related to the deep approach (r=0.44). Both relationships were statistically significant (p<0.01) and consistent with prior literature (Duff 2004b;Gordon and Debus 2002;Zhu et al 2008). In addition, there was a statistically significant, negative relationship between the students' deep approach and factor 1 (r=-0.18).…”
Section: Reliability and Correlationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…General educational literature has noted that the impact that the variable age (a proxy for maturity) has on student performance has been inconclusive (Duff, 2004;Guney, 2009). In accounting, Bartlett, Peel and Pendlebury (1993) found that on average older students achieved lower grades in all examinations but significantly so in respect of their third year subjects.…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple and binary regressions were used to understand the effects of placements on yearly and final degree academic marks as well as final degree classifications which were a binary dependent variable taking 1 if students obtained good degrees and zero otherwise, similar to prior studies (Morrison et al 2005;Mansfield 2011;Crawford and Wang 2014b;Surridge 2009;Rankin et al 2003;Duff 2004;Richardson 2008;Richardson 2012). Based on the literature, a range of independent variables which reflect individual differences in prior academic achievement, prior academic qualification and gender among home and international student groups were included in regressions along with mode of study Crawford and Wang 2014c;Crawford and Wang 2014a;Crawford and Wang 2014b) show that the academic performance of university students is strongly correlated with 3 or more A grades.…”
Section: Methodologies and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%