2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02761460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underpricing and IPO ownership retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jain and Kini (1994) show that there is a direct relationship between ownership retention and underpricing, yet Mikkelson and Shah (1994) find the inverse relation between these two variables. Non-linear relationship between retention and underpricing is found in the study of Robinson et al (2004). At the retention rate of 45%, underpricing is at its height, but in general, ownership retention is negatively associated with underpricing.…”
Section: Ownership Retention Underwriting Portion and Underpricing (mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jain and Kini (1994) show that there is a direct relationship between ownership retention and underpricing, yet Mikkelson and Shah (1994) find the inverse relation between these two variables. Non-linear relationship between retention and underpricing is found in the study of Robinson et al (2004). At the retention rate of 45%, underpricing is at its height, but in general, ownership retention is negatively associated with underpricing.…”
Section: Ownership Retention Underwriting Portion and Underpricing (mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some previous studies have investigated the relation between ownership retention and underpricing (Mikkelson and Shah, 1994;Jain and Kini, 1994;Jog and McConomy, 2003;Robinson et al, 2004;Gumanti and Niagara, 2006) as well as the link between underwriter reputation and underpricing (Baron, 1982;Rock, 1986;Beatty and Ritter, 1986;Carter and Manaster, 1990;Chen and Mohan, 2002;Jog and McConomy, 2003;Loughran and Ritter, 2004;Sahoo and Rajib, 2009;Dimovski et al, 2011). However, results are inconclusive.…”
Section: Ownership Retention Underwriting Portion and Underpricing (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers, using behavioural and agency perspectives (e.g., Wasserman, 2008) have found a positive relationship between founder owner equity and performance, while nonfounder ownership leads to lower performance. Other researchers, however, have found an inverted U shaped curvilinear relationship between individual ownership and IPO performance (e.g., Robinson, Robinson, & Peng, 2004) where higher share retention is argued to lead to better monitoring, and not expropriation. Such a finding is consistent with a behavioural perspective (Cyert & March, 1992;Sur et al, 2013) and best describes the aspirations of the founder or individual owners.…”
Section: Individuals As Ownersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This theory has many impact on this IPO issue. Research work on this issue were conducted by (Robinson and Peng 2004). They have conducted their research on US market which is considered as the largest stock market around the world.…”
Section: Rational Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%