2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underpinning the Food Matrix Regulation of Postexercise Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis by Comparing Salmon Ingestion With the Sum of Its Isolated Nutrients in Healthy Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data join a growing body of work which fail to confirm the directional (or at least quantitative) association between the speed, magnitude, and/or overall postprandial leucine response and the stimulation of (postexercise) MPS (22). Interestingly, the lack of support for the "leucine trigger hypothesis" has, to date, mainly come via studies that have used protein-rich whole foods (29,46,48,49,(66)(67)(68), in contrast to the present study which provided isolated protein sources. We are not the first, however, to show lesser systemic leucine (and other EAAs) responses in tandem with comparable postprandial (and postexercise) stimulations of MPS after concentrated/isolated plant vs animal protein ingestion, with >25 g of potato (69), pea (29), and soy (14) protein as examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The present data join a growing body of work which fail to confirm the directional (or at least quantitative) association between the speed, magnitude, and/or overall postprandial leucine response and the stimulation of (postexercise) MPS (22). Interestingly, the lack of support for the "leucine trigger hypothesis" has, to date, mainly come via studies that have used protein-rich whole foods (29,46,48,49,(66)(67)(68), in contrast to the present study which provided isolated protein sources. We are not the first, however, to show lesser systemic leucine (and other EAAs) responses in tandem with comparable postprandial (and postexercise) stimulations of MPS after concentrated/isolated plant vs animal protein ingestion, with >25 g of potato (69), pea (29), and soy (14) protein as examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, contrary to our hypothesis, and not in line with our previous work ( 29 , 30 ) , milk ingestion resulted in a ∼19 % lower postprandial total amino acid availability than mycoprotein, likely attributed to the manner in which the milk protein was provided. Given milk is typically consumed as a nutrient-dense food and recent work demonstrating a robust MPS response following whole-food ingestion ( 14 , 30 , 32 , 40 , 53 , 54 ) , we provided a whole food as opposed to an isolated milk protein beverage (as we had in previous work). However, this resulted in higher carbohydrate and fat contents in the milk drink ( Table 3 ), which likely dampened the plasma aminoacidaemic response, as these macronutrients have been demonstrated to delay gastric emptying and/or protein digestion and amino acid absorption ( 43 , 55 , 56 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structural changes can influence the postprandial amino acid availability and, likely, the consequent metabolic fate of the ingested amino acids. For example, faster and greater rises in postprandial plasma amino acid concentrations have been demonstrated to result in a greater increase in amino acid oxidation [ 49 ] and are often suggested to produce a greater anabolic response [ 5 ]. Furthermore, the majority of dietary protein we ingest is contained within nutrient-dense, structurally complex food/protein matrices that have undergone (multiple) processing methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%