2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underpinning-based simultaneous extraction of contiguous sections of a thick coal seam under weak and laminated parting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be defined as the direct caving movement type of a cantilever structure (direct caving). Besides, the condition to be satisfied for direct caving of SKS 1 should not only satisfy inequality (3), but also satisfy inequality (5), restated as (7), below:…”
Section: Movement Type Of Cantilever Structure Of Sksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be defined as the direct caving movement type of a cantilever structure (direct caving). Besides, the condition to be satisfied for direct caving of SKS 1 should not only satisfy inequality (3), but also satisfy inequality (5), restated as (7), below:…”
Section: Movement Type Of Cantilever Structure Of Sksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Moreover, field observations show that the coal recovery rate achieved using FMMTLMH is 10%-15% higher than with fully mechanized top coal caving mining. Although fully mechanized top coal caving mining has the advantages of high output and high efficiency, it has some disadvantages, such as increased risk of coal spontaneous combustion in the goaf, high dust concentration in the face, and a low coal recovery rate, compared with FMMTLMH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars from China and other countries have done much work on the structure characteristics of the overlying strata at thick seam fully-mechanized faces [4][5][6][7][8][9]. There is a common belief that the equilibrium mechanical structure in the strata will move up as mining height increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]. Mandal et al(2008) conducted instrumentation study in the contiguous seams, where weak and laminated roof parting existed in the coal seam, at a depth of cover varying from 25 to 170 m. Convergence was detected in the stations from the goaf edge at a distance of 120m in top section as compared to 135m in bottom section and the stress measured to 1.8MPa in top seam and 0.35 MPa in the bottom seam was observed [10]. In one of the strata instrumentation study (Singh et al,3) for evaluation of parting stability and caving behaviour, cumulative convergence at the face was observed to be 3mm per day, where full parting caved down completely at a cover depth of about 80m with a parting thickness of 2-3m.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%