2013
DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undernutrition among infants less than 6 months of age: an underestimated public health problem in India

Abstract: In India most childhood nutrition recommendations and interventions are still not focused on infants under 6 months. Secondary data analyses of National Family Health Survey-3 data from India were analysed to compare the prevalence of wasting, stunting and underweight in infants less than 6 months and 6-59 months. Our results revealed that wasting was higher (31%) in infants less than 6 months (P < 0.05) as compared with children between 6 and 59 months. Thirteen per cent of infants less than 6 months had seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, on the risk factors of being underweight, our findings are in line with results derived from similar cross‐sectional data on children aged less than 6 months that have shown association of exclusive breastfeeding with underweight (Kuchenbecker et al, ; Patwari, Kumar, & Beard, ). The data collection method for establishing exclusive breastfeeding was different for each of these studies, with some studies reporting a higher probability of recall bias, such that the results of the studies are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, on the risk factors of being underweight, our findings are in line with results derived from similar cross‐sectional data on children aged less than 6 months that have shown association of exclusive breastfeeding with underweight (Kuchenbecker et al, ; Patwari, Kumar, & Beard, ). The data collection method for establishing exclusive breastfeeding was different for each of these studies, with some studies reporting a higher probability of recall bias, such that the results of the studies are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We have previously showed that despite the lack of focus on assessing the nutritional status in this age group (Lopriore et al 2007), acute malnutrition among infants <6mo is a public health concern (Kerac et al 2011), a prevalence that others have characterized as an underestimated public health problem (Patwari et al 2015). Our analysis contributes to this evidence by showing that infants <6mo also account for an important proportion of children receiving inpatient therapeutic care.…”
Section: Programme Burdenmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…), a prevalence that others have characterized as an underestimated public health problem (Patwari et al . ). Our analysis contributes to this evidence by showing that infants <6mo also account for an important proportion of children receiving inpatient therapeutic care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 79 When linear growth among infants in developing countries was evaluated using 2006 WHO growth standards, the prevalence of stunting in the first half of infancy doubled compared to prior estimates; 80 in some countries, such as India, 20% of infants are stunted before 6 months of age. 81 , 82 There is therefore an increasing appreciation of undernutrition in infants under 6 months, who are often excluded from nutrition surveys and marginalised in nutrition programmes, 83 and a realisation that interventions need to be targeted earlier than was previously appreciated.…”
Section: The Pathogenesis Of Stuntingmentioning
confidence: 99%