2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95259-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underlying SUSY in a generalized Jaynes–Cummings model

Abstract: We present a general qubit-boson interaction Hamiltonian that describes the Jaynes–Cummings model and its extensions as a single Hamiltonian class. Our model includes non-linear processes for both the free qubit and boson field as well as non-linear, multi-boson excitation exchange between them. It shows an underlying algebra with supersymmetric quantum mechanics features allowing an operator based diagonalization that simplifies the calculations of observables. As a practical example, we show the evolution of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I D, was further analyzed in [135], while it has also been discussed in terms of generalized JC models (see sec. I E) [136].…”
Section: General Solution and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…I D, was further analyzed in [135], while it has also been discussed in terms of generalized JC models (see sec. I E) [136].…”
Section: General Solution and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We identify constants of motion that lead to an exact solvability. Similar general models have already been considered and their exact solution is known [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. However, here we are interested in presenting a general approximate solution for initial coherent states with a large mean number of quanta that is especially convenient for analyzing the entanglement in the system as it is expressed in terms of material Bell states and coherent states of the field.…”
Section: Generalized Two-atom Tavis-cummings Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…concurrence can be evaluated in closed form using Eqs. (43) and (44). The calculations are somehow tedious as ζ | ζ1,k = 0; however, one can find that the only two nonzero values of λ i are given by (…”
Section: A Two-atom Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 99%