Underlying mechanisms of complex interventions addressing the care of older adults with multimorbidity: a realist review

Abstract

ObjectivesTo understand how and why effective multi-chronic disease management interventions influence health outcomes in older adults 65 years of age or older.DesignA realist review.Data sourcesElectronic databases including Medline and Embase (inception to December 2017); and the grey literature.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe considered any studies (ie, experimental quasi-experimental, observational, qualitative and mixed-methods studies) as long as they provided data to explain our programme theories and effectiveness review (published elsewhere) findings. The population of interest was older adults (age ≥65 years) with two or more chronic conditions.AnalysisWe used the Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) quality and publication criteria for our synthesis aimed at refining our programme theories such that they contained multiple context-mechanism-outcome configurations describing the ways different mechanisms fire to generate outcomes. We created a 3-step synthesis process grounded in meta-ethnography to separate units of data from articles, and to derive explanatory statements across them.Results106 articles contributed to the analysis. We refined our programme theories to explain multimorbidity management in older adults: (1) care coordination interventions with the best potential for impact are team-based strategies, disease management programmes and case management; (2) optimised disease prioritisation involves ensuring that clinician work with patients to identify what symptoms are problematic and why, and to explore options that are acceptable to both clinicians and patients and (3) optimised patient self-management is dependent on patients’ capacity for selfcare and to what extent, and establishing what patients need to enable selfcare.ConclusionsTo optimise care, both clinical management and patient self-management need to be considered from multiple perspectives (patient, provider and system). To mitigate the complexities of multimorbidity management, patients focus on reducing symptoms and preserving quality of life while providers focus on the condition that most threaten morbidity and mortality.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42014014489.

<p>Improving Exercise-Based Interventions for People Living with Both COPD and Frailty: A Realist Review</p>

“…Realist reviews have been used to understand a variety of complex health interventions with multimorbid populations. 31,32 The methods draw on a realist philosophy, taking a "generative" view of how interventions work (including contextual factors), as opposed to a more positivist "successionist" view. 33 Realist reviews are explanatory, seeking to unpick the important mechanisms underlying sets of interventions.…”

What matters when asking, “what matters to you?” — perceptions and experiences of health care providers on involving older people in transitional care

“…WMTY is based on the concepts of person-centered and patient-centered care (PCC) 1 These are multifaceted concepts that several concept analyses have set out to define [24]. The commonalities of these concepts are that they constitute new models of care that can be conceptualized as responses to a biomedical paternalistic health care model in which the patient has a passive, dependent role and the HCP is the decision-making expert.…”

“…With an aging population and increase in chronic health problems among older people [1], stakeholders have shifted their focus to transitional care [2]. Transitional care is a broad term for care interventions that promote the safe and timely transfer of patients between levels of care and across settings, such as from hospital to home or other care settings in the community [3,4].…”

Facilitators and barriers of managing patients with multiple chronic conditions in the community: a qualitative study

“…Two other studies in France and Canada illustrated that certain tasks involved in managing chronic conditions could be transferred from physicians to non-physicians within the team, as long as roles were clearly defined [25,26]. Nonetheless, there is still a lack of effective evidence-based interventions, making it necessary to establish more targeted interventions with greater consideration of patient-centredness in care delivery [27][28][29][30][31].…”