Subsurface Space 1981
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-8421-7.50098-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underground Siting of a Candu Nuclear Power Station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SMRs attempt to lower the risk of radioactivity release to the atmosphere from a reactor accident by constructing reactors underground, but this increases construction cost. For example, a study from Canada showed a 31 to 36 percent increase relative to an equivalent surface facility, and warned about “potentially more difficult construction and operating procedures” (Oberth and Lee 1980, 711). The SMR literature pays little attention to these problems.…”
Section: Contradictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMRs attempt to lower the risk of radioactivity release to the atmosphere from a reactor accident by constructing reactors underground, but this increases construction cost. For example, a study from Canada showed a 31 to 36 percent increase relative to an equivalent surface facility, and warned about “potentially more difficult construction and operating procedures” (Oberth and Lee 1980, 711). The SMR literature pays little attention to these problems.…”
Section: Contradictionmentioning
confidence: 99%