2021
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undergraduate nursing students' education and training in aseptic technique: A mixed methods systematic review

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This diversity can enrich the discussions and enhance the validity of the study's conclusions. This finding supports a study on the education and training of undergraduate nursing students in sterile technique [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This diversity can enrich the discussions and enhance the validity of the study's conclusions. This finding supports a study on the education and training of undergraduate nursing students in sterile technique [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings corroborate earlier research: variations concerning when procedures should be conducted aseptically and how PRAs should be performed [6,7,8]; inadequacies in teaching and competency assessment for pre-registration students in the UK [23] and other countries [24]; poor access to CPD post-qualification, especially for nurses in primary and domiciliary care [9]; and lack of emphasis on the principles of asepsis [23]. Opinions concerning need for asepsis when dressing chronic wounds and precisely at which points to don sterile gloves for a specific PRA differed.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Informants in our study expressed a need for more detailed guidance and better preparation to undertake PRAs, corroborating a growing body of opinion and research [6][7][8][9]23,24]. The ANTT © framework [27] currently in use is described as being designed for all settings where aseptic technique is conducted but practitioners are required to undertake their own risk assessment when they decide whether or not a specific procedure requires asepsis.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research adopted the method of systematic review, summarized the relevant literature, and discussed the effect and influence of leadership training in undergraduate medical education. Hawker et al (2022) [ 51 ] systematically reviewed the education and training of aseptic technique for undergraduate nursing students through mixed methods. The research comprehensively analyzed the results of questionnaire survey and qualitative research, and summarized the current situation and problems of aseptic technology education and training for undergraduate nursing students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%