“…For example, Torres and Solberg (2001) reported a positive relationship between academic self-efficacy and the number of hours students spent studying. In addition, a number of studies demonstrated that self-efficacy is related to the use of effective learning strategies that, in turn, result in higher achievement in college (Hsieh, Sullivan, Sass, & Guerra, 2012;Sins, van Joolingen, Savelsbergh, & van Hout-Wolters, 2008;Walker, Greene, & Mansell, 2006;Zajacova, Lynch, & Espenshade, 2005). For instance, Walker, Greene, and Mansell (2006) found that self-efficacy was predictive of deep cognitive processing among college students and Zajacova, Lynch, and Espenshade (2005) reported that self-efficacy was predictive of college GPA.…”
Four studies report the development and psychometric properties of the new Self-Regulated Learning Test Anxiety Scale (SRLTAS). The measure assesses aspects of test anxiety (TA) from a Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) perspective and provides evidence regarding areas of TA that may be targeted for subsequent learning strategy interventions. Study 1 provided descriptive information, explored the factor structure, and addressed variance in TA across test item formats and student characteristics. Study 2 examined the stability of the SRLTAS and explored initial relations between the SRLTAS and other known TA measures. Study 3 provided confirmatory validity evidence and tested the factor structure in a new sample. Study 4 provided extended validity evidence as SRLTAS scores were examined with other representative SRL scores.
“…For example, Torres and Solberg (2001) reported a positive relationship between academic self-efficacy and the number of hours students spent studying. In addition, a number of studies demonstrated that self-efficacy is related to the use of effective learning strategies that, in turn, result in higher achievement in college (Hsieh, Sullivan, Sass, & Guerra, 2012;Sins, van Joolingen, Savelsbergh, & van Hout-Wolters, 2008;Walker, Greene, & Mansell, 2006;Zajacova, Lynch, & Espenshade, 2005). For instance, Walker, Greene, and Mansell (2006) found that self-efficacy was predictive of deep cognitive processing among college students and Zajacova, Lynch, and Espenshade (2005) reported that self-efficacy was predictive of college GPA.…”
Four studies report the development and psychometric properties of the new Self-Regulated Learning Test Anxiety Scale (SRLTAS). The measure assesses aspects of test anxiety (TA) from a Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) perspective and provides evidence regarding areas of TA that may be targeted for subsequent learning strategy interventions. Study 1 provided descriptive information, explored the factor structure, and addressed variance in TA across test item formats and student characteristics. Study 2 examined the stability of the SRLTAS and explored initial relations between the SRLTAS and other known TA measures. Study 3 provided confirmatory validity evidence and tested the factor structure in a new sample. Study 4 provided extended validity evidence as SRLTAS scores were examined with other representative SRL scores.
“…This protocol will cover methods to measure salivary biomarkers and galvanic skin responses during an exam activity and compare it against the information obtained from self-reports and interviews. For this work, an engineering exam and students were selected due to the difficult and complex nature of the discipline 1,6 and concepts, which may ignite both cognitive and emotional responses in the participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' abilities to 'emotionally respond' to challenging course tasks 2 are pivotal to students' professional development. Yet, nearer to real-time responses related to academic achievement emotions are under-explored [3][4][5][6] . This paper presents a protocol to study ways to explore nearer real-time responses from students (e.g., physiological responses) when presented with representative classroom situations (e.g., test taking) using salivary biomarkers, galvanic skin responses, and self-reported surveys and interviews.…”
Typically, self-reports are used in educational research to assess student response and performance to a classroom activity. Yet, addition of biological and physiological measures such as salivary biomarkers and galvanic skin responses are rarely included, limiting the wealth of information that can be obtained to better understand student performance. A laboratory protocol to study undergraduate students' responses to classroom events (e.g., exams) is presented. Participants were asked to complete a representative exam for their degree. Before and after the laboratory exam session, students completed an academic achievement emotions self-report and an interview that paralleled these questions when participants wore a galvanic skin sensor and salivary biomarkers were collected. Data collected from the three methods resulted in greater depth of information about students' performance when compared to the self-report. The work can expand educational research capabilities through more comprehensive methods for obtaining nearer to real-time student responses to an examination activity.
Video LinkThe video component of this article can be found at
“…Therefore this study will cast further light on the predictive value of the SOC construct within the traditional aged U.S. college student. Additionally, the literature also shows that the use of adaptive coping strategies are associated with lower stress, improved health, and improved academic achievement within the college student population (Devonport & Lane, 2006;Hsieh, Sullivan, Sass, & Guerra, 2012;Mahmoud, Staten, Hall, & Lennie, 2012;Snell et al, 2011). While Antonovsky contends that SOC does not predict a specific coping style, there is evidence in the literature to suggest that a high SOC is associated with a greater tendency to employ more problem-focused coping strategies and a low SOC is associated with more emotion-focused health behaviors.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.