1995
DOI: 10.1080/15332276.1995.11672824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underachievement of Highly able Students and the Peer Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of social support, peers are vitally important in adolescence and play a significant role in both positive and negative academic outcomes for students generally (Clasen & Clasen, 1995;Reis, Hébert, Diaz, Maxfield, & Ratley, 1995). In relation to gifted adolescents, Betts and Neihart (1988), proposed that some gifted students may ''go underground'' to fit in with same-age peers, whereas Gross (1989) drew attention to the ''forced choice'' that gifted students often face in either pursuing excellence at the cost of friendships or sacrificing their own interests to gain acceptance from chronological peers.…”
Section: Academic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In terms of social support, peers are vitally important in adolescence and play a significant role in both positive and negative academic outcomes for students generally (Clasen & Clasen, 1995;Reis, Hébert, Diaz, Maxfield, & Ratley, 1995). In relation to gifted adolescents, Betts and Neihart (1988), proposed that some gifted students may ''go underground'' to fit in with same-age peers, whereas Gross (1989) drew attention to the ''forced choice'' that gifted students often face in either pursuing excellence at the cost of friendships or sacrificing their own interests to gain acceptance from chronological peers.…”
Section: Academic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The internal factors, also known as psychological factors, which are identified as reasons in general for students' poor performance, include students' perceptions, attitudes, and motivations (Reis & McCoach, 2000). Besides these, low self-esteem (Whitmore, 1980), negative attitude toward school (McCall, Evahn, & Kratzer, 1992), negative peer influence (Clasen & Clasen, 1995;Weiner, 1992), and low self-motivation and self-regulation (Borkowski & Thorpe, 1994) also have been identified by the researchers associated with the poor performance of students. Lin, LaCounte, and Eder (1988) mention in their article that a study of American Indian higher education identified the reasons for academic poor performance as poor high school preparation, financial problems, poor study habits, and other ''individually'' based factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Primera radi, u istraživanju Rajsa i saradnika (Reis et al, 1995, prema: McCoach, 2002) ustanovljena je mogućnost poboljšanja učinka darovitih podbacivača nakon određenog perioda druženja sa učenicima koji ostvaruju visoko školsko postignuće. Sa druge strane, u istraživanjima uzroka podbacivanja darovitih učenika 66% proglašava negativan uticaj vršnjačke grupe jednom od glavnih prepreka aktuelizacije vlastitih potencijala (Clasen & Clasen, 1995). Druga istraživanja, takođe, ukazuju na to da se "sila vršnjačke teže" nipošto ne sme potceniti: Bernt (Berndt, 1999, prema: Reis & McCoach, 2000, na primer, nalazi da postignuće učenika teži da se približi postignuću njegovih drugova i da mu se ocene tokom godine smanjuju ukoliko su njegovi drugovi imali niže ocene u prvom polugodištu.…”
Section: Istraživanja Povezanosti Sredinskih Prilika I Ostvarenja Darunclassified