2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Under-reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
70
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many authors have investigated VFs using different imaging modalities, such as radiography, dual-energy Xray absorptiometry and CT [9,14,17,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, many authors have investigated VFs using different imaging modalities, such as radiography, dual-energy Xray absorptiometry and CT [9,14,17,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results show that detection is still low when VFs are not the intent of the study [13,14]. Radiographs of the chest and abdomen, as well as CT sagittal multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), have been considered [7,8,15,16] following the widespread use of CT imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidental osteoporotic VFs are usually under-reported on radiograph and CT (7)(8)(9)(10). The sensitivity of axial CT images in detecting these fractures is poor, sagittal reformation is recommended to improve the detection rate (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many vertebral fractures are never brought to clinical attention [4][5][6][7], and valid estimates of the prevalence of these fractures must be based on a radiographical survey of the population. Use of the term ''vertebral deformity'' is now standard in morphometric studies performed without reference to clinical presentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%