2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Under pressure: quenching star formation in low-mass satellite galaxies via stripping

Abstract: Recent studies of galaxies in the local Universe, including those in the Local Group, find that the efficiency of environmental (or satellite) quenching increases dramatically at satellite stellar masses below ∼ 10 8 M . This suggest a physical scale where quenching transitions from a slow "starvation" mode to a rapid "stripping" mode at low masses. We investigate the plausibility of this scenario using observed HI surface density profiles for a sample of 66 nearby galaxies as inputs to analytic calculations o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
123
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
17
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However we find that this is not the case (see Figure 11b). This therefore rules out RPS as the dominant environmental quenching mechanism, in support of the simulations of Emerick et al (2016) and Fillingham et al (2016) which showed that RPS could only remove 40 − 60% of a satellite's gas. However, this conclusion may be due to the stellar mass range spanned by the gz2-group-q satellite galaxies which all have M * 10 9 M , as simulations by Fillingham et al (2016) suggest that RPS only becomes effective in lower mass satellites with M * 10 8−9 M , in agreement with Hester (2006).…”
Section: The Role Of the Environment In Quenchingsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However we find that this is not the case (see Figure 11b). This therefore rules out RPS as the dominant environmental quenching mechanism, in support of the simulations of Emerick et al (2016) and Fillingham et al (2016) which showed that RPS could only remove 40 − 60% of a satellite's gas. However, this conclusion may be due to the stellar mass range spanned by the gz2-group-q satellite galaxies which all have M * 10 9 M , as simulations by Fillingham et al (2016) suggest that RPS only becomes effective in lower mass satellites with M * 10 8−9 M , in agreement with Hester (2006).…”
Section: The Role Of the Environment In Quenchingsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In order to compare groups of different sizes, the virial radius is used as a normalisation factor to this projected group-centric radius. Here we use a proxy to the virial radius, R200 (see Navarro et al 1995), the radius within which the group mass overdensity is 200 times the critical density, ρcrit(z), as defined by Finn et al 2005:…”
Section: Group Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a quiescent dwarf galaxy located close to, but beyond, the virial radius of Milky Way, EriII is a key object for studying environmental influences on low-mass galaxies and the quenching of star formation in such systems (Weisz et al 2014;Wetzel et al 2015;Wheeler et al 2015;Fillingham et al 2016).…”
Section: -5 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental effects such as ram-pressure stripping or tidal interaction provide another potential mechanism for the removal of gas from galaxies (Gavazzi et al 2005;Hester 2006;Fillingham et al 2016). However, environmentally induced gas removal processes are expected to be more efficient in dense environments and should therefore lead to a flattening of the slope of the HIMF in dense clusters rather than loose groups, e.g.…”
Section: Slope Of the H I Mass Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%