Under Pressure: Centralizing Regulation in Response to Presidential Priorities

Selin, Jennifer L.; Drolc, Cody A.; Butcher, Jordan; Brothers, Nicholas L.; Brant, Hanna K.

doi:10.1111/psq.12764

Pres Stud Q

2021

DOI: 10.1111/psq.12764

|View full text |Cite

Under Pressure: Centralizing Regulation in Response to Presidential Priorities

Jennifer L. Selin¹,

Cody A. Drolc²,

Jordan Butcher³

et al.

Abstract: Carolina. His research focuses on administrative oversight and intergovernmental program implementation. Jordan Butcher is an assistant professor of Political Science at Arkansas State University. Her research centers on government institutions and how they influence political careers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 91 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Presidential agendas in statutory interpretation: A case study of the Ministry of Government Legislation of Korea (MGLK)

Kim,

Lee,

Park

2024

Int Social Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we examined how and whether a government organisation aligns with a presidential agenda. At all stages of the policy development process, the president interacts with government bodies, despite the principle of the separation of powers. Moreover, in any government organisation, policy implementation begins with interpreting the president's agenda and preferences, given that state administration policy is presented as the law only after the legislature's deliberation and resolution. Our study's premise is that the president's policy agenda preferences and the bureaucratic agency's willingness to act are the drivers of statutory interpretation, which is often neglected but is nonetheless crucial to administrative decision‐making. In addition to interpreting the statutes, the Ministry of Government Legislation of Korea (MGLK) is also a conduit for presidential policy; as such, the MGLK can significantly impact policy formulation and implementation.

show abstract

Presidential agendas in statutory interpretation: A case study of the Ministry of Government Legislation of Korea (MGLK)

Kim,

Lee,

Park

2024

Int Social Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Under Pressure: Centralizing Regulation in Response to Presidential Priorities

Abstract: Carolina. His research focuses on administrative oversight and intergovernmental program implementation. Jordan Butcher is an assistant professor of Political Science at Arkansas State University. Her research centers on government institutions and how they influence political careers.

Cited by 1 publication

References 91 publications

Presidential agendas in statutory interpretation: A case study of the Ministry of Government Legislation of Korea (MGLK)

Presidential agendas in statutory interpretation: A case study of the Ministry of Government Legislation of Korea (MGLK)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About