2020
DOI: 10.1002/lno.11618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Under‐ice mesocosms reveal the primacy of light but the importance of zooplankton in winter phytoplankton dynamics

Abstract: Factors that regulate planktonic communities under lake ice may be vastly different from those during the open-water season. Expected changes in light availability, ice cover, and snowfall associated with climate change have accelerated the need to understand food web processes under ice. We hypothesized that light limitation (bottom-up control) outweighs zooplankton grazing (top-down control) influence on phytoplankton biovolume and community structure under ice in a north temperate lake. Using in situ under-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both lakes, the light under the ice increased rapidly when ice started to melt and especially following snowmelt (Figure 7). There was, however, no indication of a spring bloom and higher Chl‐ a concentrations, despite the known light limiting effects of ice and snow cover on phytoplankton growth (Hrycik & Stockwell, 2021). It is likely that our water samples that were taken from the integrated water column prevented us from measuring increases in Chl‐ a that may have been restricted to close to the lit surface by radiative convection that initiates in late winter (Cortés & MacIntyre, 2019), or in subsurface convective cells (Bégin, Tanabe, Rautio, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both lakes, the light under the ice increased rapidly when ice started to melt and especially following snowmelt (Figure 7). There was, however, no indication of a spring bloom and higher Chl‐ a concentrations, despite the known light limiting effects of ice and snow cover on phytoplankton growth (Hrycik & Stockwell, 2021). It is likely that our water samples that were taken from the integrated water column prevented us from measuring increases in Chl‐ a that may have been restricted to close to the lit surface by radiative convection that initiates in late winter (Cortés & MacIntyre, 2019), or in subsurface convective cells (Bégin, Tanabe, Rautio, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snow-free ice can show a high transmittance for radiation (Bolsenga & Vanderploeg, 1992;Jewson et al, 2009), and thus light-driven mixing (Kirillin et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2017) and photosynthesis (Garcia et al, 2019) occur under ice. Especially, light differences determine the composition of under-ice phytoplankton (Charvet et al, 2014;Kalinowska & Grabowska, 2016;Hrycik & Stockwell, 2021), and the stimulation of under-ice primary production by increased light availability also enhances the activity of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria (Garcia et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, water column NO 3 concentrations could decrease over time in frozen eutrophic lakes if NO 3 inputs to the lake water column from external (groundwater or riverine discharges) and internal (nitrification) sources are lower than NO 3 removal via denitrification. Furthermore, if light is not too low under the snow and ice, autotrophic uptake could also promote N removal in shallow eutrophic lakes (Hrycik and Stockwell 2021). Thus, studies that analyze temporally resolved under-ice monitoring data in N-rich lakes are necessary to assess this conceptual model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%