2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12052294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering Vegetation Changes in the Urban–Rural Interface through Semi-Automatic Methods

Abstract: Forest fires are considered by Portuguese civil protection as one of the most serious natural disasters due to their frequency and extent. To address the problem, the Fire Forest Defense System establishes the implementation of fuel management bands to aid firefighting. The aim of this study was to develop a model capable of identifying vegetation removal in the urban–rural interface defined by law for fuel management actions. The model uses normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) of Sentinel-2 images ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The imperviousness HRL represents the spatial distribution of artificially sealed areas, including the degree of soil sealing per unit area. The level of soil sealing (degree of imperviousness from 1 to 100) is produced using a semi-automated classification based on calibrated normalized difference vegetation index [51][52][53]. The forest density dataset was then used to classify the unbuilt land.…”
Section: Land Use Land Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imperviousness HRL represents the spatial distribution of artificially sealed areas, including the degree of soil sealing per unit area. The level of soil sealing (degree of imperviousness from 1 to 100) is produced using a semi-automated classification based on calibrated normalized difference vegetation index [51][52][53]. The forest density dataset was then used to classify the unbuilt land.…”
Section: Land Use Land Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies investigate its operationalization, and there is a high degree of uncertainty about how the system should be measured empirically and how it should be designed to effectively perform nature conservation [31], thus, there is a fundamental need for a standardized measure of the impact by systematic monitoring. Regarding the second aspect, significant differences arise within the scope and kind of indicators that are used to measure the impacts of land-use changes [35]. Soil sealing, tree cover density, habitat quality, carbon sequestration, nutrient retention, water yield, and many other biophysical datasets can be employed to measure the impacts of human-induced land alteration [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering vegetation by defining different NDVI threshold values such as 10%, 15% or 20% can be considered relevant for short-time monitoring, while defining NDVI threshold values of 25% to 50% can be considered large steps for longer time interval observations [33]. According to this approach, it is commonly used to detect statistically significant differences between NDVI values in small catchment sites while employing standard deviation (zscores) and probability values (p-scores) at certain confidence levels in small spatial radius (500 m or less) [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%