Uncovering the wisdom hidden between the lines: the Collaborative Reflexive Deliberative Approach

Abstract

BackgroundMeta-analysis and meta-synthesis have been developed to synthesize results across published studies; however, they are still largely grounded in what is already published, missing the tacit ‘between the lines’ knowledge generated during many research projects that are not intrinsic to the main objectives of studies.ObjectiveTo develop a novel approach to expand and deepen meta-syntheses using researchers’ experience, tacit knowledge and relevant unpublished materials.MethodsWe established new collaborations among primary health care researchers from different contexts based on common interests in reforming primary care service delivery and a diversity of perspectives. Over 2 years, the team met face-to-face and via tele- and video-conferences to employ the Collaborative Reflexive Deliberative Approach (CRDA) to discuss and reflect on published and unpublished results from participants’ studies to identify new patterns and insights.ResultsCRDA focuses on uncovering critical insights, interpretations hidden within multiple research contexts. For the process to work, careful attention must be paid to ensure sufficient diversity among participants while also having people who are able to collaborate effectively. Ensuring there are enough studies for contextual variation also matters. It is necessary to balance rigorous facilitation techniques with the creation of safe space for diverse contributions.ConclusionsThe CRDA requires large commitments of investigator time, the expense of convening facilitated retreats, considerable coordination, and strong leadership. The process creates an environment where interactions among diverse participants can illuminate hidden information within the contexts of studies, effectively enhancing theory development and generating new research questions and strategies.

Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries

“…Our approach 13 draws upon the principles of participatory action research 14 and narrative, meta-narrative, and realist synthesis 15 – 17 using an open system approach. 18 Participatory action research seeks to integrate participatory interaction and the lived experience into the research process.…”

Searching for the Impact of Participation in Health and Health Research: Challenges and Methods

“…Author interviews can be conducted, to explain relationships between participation, outcomes, and longer term impact that were not reported in primary studies [ 10 ]. Collaborative reflection across researchers on different projects has also recently been used to capture “between the lines” knowledge that may not be reflected in the main objectives or published studies [ 65 ].…”

Thinking with complexity in evaluation: A case study review

“…For the purposes of this article, we have engaged in a collaborative, reflexive, deliberation approach (CRDA; Crabtree et al, 2018). Crabtree and colleagues (2018) describe CRDA as a novel approach that uncovers critical insights and interpretations hidden across varying research contexts.…”

“…For the purposes of this article, we have engaged in a collaborative, reflexive, deliberation approach (CRDA; Crabtree et al, 2018). Crabtree and colleagues (2018) describe CRDA as a novel approach that uncovers critical insights and interpretations hidden across varying research contexts. Researchers collaborate, using CRDA to discuss and reflect on published and unpublished research findings to identify patterns and insights.…”